+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Risk factors for dating violence versus cohabiting violence: Results from the third generation of the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development

Risk factors for dating violence versus cohabiting violence: Results from the third generation of the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development

Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health 26(4): 229-239

Dating violence is an important problem. Evidence suggests that women are more likely to perpetrate dating violence. The present study investigates the prevalence of dating violence compared with cohabiting violence in a community sample of men and women and assesses to what extent child and adolescent explanatory factors predict this behaviour. A secondary aim is to construct a risk score for dating violence based on the strongest risk factors. The Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development is a prospective longitudinal survey of 411 men (generation 2) born in the 1950s in an inner London area. Most recently, their sons and daughters [generation 3 (G3)] have been interviewed regarding their perpetration of dating and cohabiting violence, utilising the Conflict Tactics Scale. Risk factors were measured in four domains (family, parental, socio-economic and individual). A larger proportion of women than men perpetrated at least one act of violence towards their dating partner (36.4 vs 21.7%). There was a similar pattern for cohabiting violence (39.6 vs 21.4%). A number of risk factors were significantly associated with the perpetration of dating violence. For G3 women, these included a convicted father, parental conflict, large family size and poor housing. For G3 men, these included having a young father or mother, separation from the father before age 16, early school leaving, frequent truancy and having a criminal conviction. A risk score for both men and women, based on 10 risk factors, significantly predicted dating violence. Risk factors from four domains were important in predicting dating violence, but they were different for G3 men and women. It may be important to consider different risk factors and different risk assessments for male compared with female perpetration of dating violence. Early identification and interventions are recommended. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058778377

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 27709744

DOI: 10.1002/cbm.2017

Related references

An Exploration of Risk Factors Associated With Dating Violence: Examining the Predictability of Adolescent Female Dating Violence Perpetration. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 25(8): 907-922, 2015

The Intersections of Drug Use Continuity With Nonviolent Offending and Involvement in Violence Over the Life Course: Findings From the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice 14(2): 95-109, 2016

Shared Risk Factors for the Perpetration of Physical Dating Violence, Bullying, and Sexual Harassment Among Adolescents Exposed to Domestic Violence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 45(4): 672-686, 2016

Dating Violence Perpetration The Predictive Roles of Maternally versus Paternally Perpetrated Childhood Abuse and Subsequent Dating Violence Attitudes and Behaviors. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma 22(1): 6-25, 2013

Development of a Dating Violence Assessment Tool for Late Adolescence Across Three Countries: The Violence in Adolescents' Dating Relationships Inventory (VADRI). Journal of Interpersonal Violence (): -, 2015

Witnessing Interparental Violence and Acceptance of Dating Violence as Predictors for Teen Dating Violence Victimization. Violence Against Women 22(5): 625-646, 2015

Event-level analysis of antecedents for youth violence: comparison of dating violence with non-dating violence. Addictive Behaviors 39(1): 350-353, 2014

A comparison of women versus men charged with intimate partner violence: general risk factors, attitudes regarding using violence, and readiness to change. Violence and Victims 23(5): 571-585, 2008

Sexual Violence Perpetration by Adolescents in Dating versus Same-Sex Peer Relationships: Differences in Associated Risk and Protective Factors. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine 14(4): 329-340, 2013

Dating Violence Affects All Adolescents: Freedner N, Freed LH, Yang W, Austin SB. Dating violence among gay, lesbian, and bisexual adolescents: Results from a community survey. J Adolesc Health 2002;31:469N74. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 48(3): 235-235, 2003

Factors Mediating the Link Between Witnessing Interparental Violence and Dating Violence. Journal of Family Violence 13(1): 39-57, 1998

Linking dating violence, peer violence, and suicidal behaviors among high-risk youth. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 34(1): 30-38, 2007

Importance of gender and attitudes about violence in the relationship between exposure to interparental violence and the perpetration of teen dating violence. Child Abuse & Neglect 37(5): 343-352, 2013

Psychopathy and community violence among civil psychiatric patients: results from the MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 69(3): 358-374, 2001

Gender's Role in Exposure to Interparental Violence, Acceptance of Violence, Self-Efficacy, and Physical Teen Dating Violence Among Quebec Adolescents. Journal of Interpersonal Violence: 886260517707311-886260517707311, 2018