+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy vs Standard Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study



Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy vs Standard Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study



Journal of Endourology 29(12): 1334-1340



The goal of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (RDN) with standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN). Forty-five voluntary kidney donors (27 for right subgroup and 18 for left subgroup) who met inclusion and exclusion criteria were randomized into 2 groups, RDN and LDN in 1:2 ratio. Primary endpoints were visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, analgesic requirement, and hospital stay of donors. Secondary endpoints were donor's intraoperative and postoperative parameters, graft outcomes, and donor surgeon's difficulty scores. All procedures were completed without any intraoperative complications. VAS pain scores at 6, 24, and 48 hours (p = 0.00), analgesic requirement (p = 0.00), and hospital stay (p = 0.00) were less in RDN than in LDN. Longer graft arterial length could be preserved with robotic approach on right side (p = 0.03) but not on left side (p = 0.77). The RDN group required more number of ports (p = 0.00), longer retrieval time (p = 0.00), and warm ischemia time (WIT) (p = 0.01). Total operative time (p = 0.14), hemoglobin drop (p = 0.97), postoperative donor complications (p = 0.97), and the recipient estimated glomerular filtration rate at 9 months (p = 0.64) were similar in both groups. Difficulty scores of console surgeon were less in most steps on right side but not on left side. Patient-side surgeon in RDN had higher difficulty scores for retrieval. RDN is safe and is associated with better morbidity profile than LDN. Robotic approach provides technical ease and facilitates preservation of longer length of renal artery on right side. Left RDN is associated with longer WIT; however, this does not translate into poor graft outcome.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058782697

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26414847

DOI: 10.1089/end.2015.0213


Related references

Can right-sided hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy be advocated above standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a randomized pilot study. Transplant International 27(2): 162-169, 2014

Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a comparison study in the canine model. Techniques in Urology 5(3): 174-178, 1999

First prize: Standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy: a randomized comparative study. Journal of Endourology 25(3): 365-370, 2011

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) for live donor nephrectomy is more time- and cost-effective than standard laparoscopic nephrectomy. Surgical Endoscopy 16(3): 422-425, 2002

Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a comparative study with conventional open donor nephrectomy in a single Chinese center. Transplantation Proceedings 40(10): 3362-3364, 2008

A randomized clinical trial of living donor nephrectomy: a plea for a differentiated appraisal of mini-open muscle splitting incision and hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Transplant International 25(9): 976-986, 2012

Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: comparable donor/recipient outcomes, costs, and decreased convalescence as compared to open donor nephrectomy. Transplantation Proceedings 33(1-2): 1106-1107, 2001

Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: comparison to pure laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Transplantation Proceedings 40(3): 687-688, 2008

Comparison of open live donor nephrectomy, laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy, and hand-assisted live donor nephrectomy: a cost-minimization analysis. Journal of Surgical Research 176(2): E89-E94, 2012

3D Endoscopic Donor Nephrectomy Versus Robot-assisted Donor Nephrectomy: A Detailed Comparison of 2 Prospective Cohorts. Transplantation 102(6): E295-E300, 2018

Robot-assisted laparoscopic vs laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in renal transplantation: A meta-analysis. Clinical Transplantation 33(1): E13451, 2019

Should hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy replace the standard laparoscopic technique for living donor nephrectomy? A meta-analysis. International Journal of Surgery 40: 83-90, 2017

Effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy in comparison with standard laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. European Urology Suppl.s 16(3): E1755-E1756, 2017

Robot-assisted laparoscopic and open live-donor nephrectomy: a comparison of donor morbidity and early renal allograft outcomes. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 21(2): 472-477, 2006

Safety and Efficacy of Retroperitoneoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy: Comparison of Early Complication, Donor and Recipient Outcome with Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy. Journal of Endourology 32(12): 1120-1124, 2018