+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Robot-assisted surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis



Robot-assisted surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis



Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 142(10): 2173-2183



To compare perioperative outcomes between robot-assisted surgery (RAS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for the treatment of endometrial cancer by conducting a meta-analysis. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and EMBASE up to January 8, 2016. Studies clearly documenting a comparison between RAS and CLS for patients with endometrial cancer were included. The perioperative outcomes of interest included intraoperative visceral injuries, postoperative complications, operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), blood transfusion, total lymph nodes harvested (TLNH), conversion to laparotomy, and length of hospital stay. The weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR) were pooled with either a fixed-effects or a random-effects model. A total of 19 studies were included in the analysis, involving 3056 patients. The pooled analysis showed that RAS was associated with lower EBL (WMD -77.65; 95 % confidence interval [CI] -105.58 to -49.72), lower conversion rate (OR 0.29; 95 % CI 0.18-0.46), and shorter hospital stay (WMD -0.48; 95 % CI -0.70 to -0.26) compared to CLS. The incidence of intraoperative visceral injuries, operation time, transfusion rate, and TLNH showed no significant differences between RAS and CLS. RAS is a feasible and effective surgical approach that may be superior to CLS for the treatment of endometrial cancer, with lower EBL and lower conversion rate. Further prospective randomized trials are required to validate our findings.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058782931

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 27217038

DOI: 10.1007/s00432-016-2180-x


Related references

Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in randomized controlled trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Plos one 13(1): E0191628, 2018

Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer staging: A meta-analysis. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 55(4): 488-494, 2016

Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part a 27(12): 1251-1262, 2017

Comparative safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 42(9): 1303-1314, 2016

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional open surgery in intraoperative and postoperative outcomes for colorectal cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 96(33): E7794, 2017

Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease, focusing on rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Annals of Surgical Oncology 19(12): 3727-3736, 2012

Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of advanced stage endometriosis: a meta-analysis. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics and Gynecology 43(3): 422-426, 2016

Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research 89(4): 190-201, 2015

Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies 28(3): 135-142, 2019

Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Surgical Endoscopy 30(12): 5601-5614, 2016

Comparison of robot-assisted surgery, laparoscopic-assisted surgery, and open surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer: A network meta-analysis. Medicine 97(34): E11817, 2018

A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 132(3): 284-291, 2016

Laparoscopic Versus Conventional Open Surgery in Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part a 28(2): 189-200, 2018

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colorectal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Surgery 207(1): 109-119, 2014

Meta-analysis of Robot-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer. In Vivo 32(3): 611-623, 2018