+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Role of the Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) in Transcriptional Regulation and Cancer



Role of the Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) in Transcriptional Regulation and Cancer



Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine 6(9)



The chromatin environment is modulated by a machinery of chromatin modifiers, required for the specification and maintenance of cell fate. Many mutations in the machinery have been linked to the development and progression of cancer. In this review, we give a brief introduction to Polycomb group (PcG) proteins, their assembly into Polycomb repressive complexes (PRCs) and the normal physiological roles of these complexes with a focus on the PRC2. We review the many findings of mutations in the PRC2 coding genes, both loss-of-function and gain-of-function, associated with human cancers and discuss potential molecular mechanisms involved in the contribution of PRC2 mutations to cancer development and progression. Finally, we discuss some of the recent advances in developing and testing drugs targeting the PRC2 as well as emerging results from clinical trials using these drugs in the treatment of human cancers.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058791167

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 27449971

DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a026575


Related references

Hypermethylated in cancer 1 (HIC1) recruits polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) to a subset of its target genes through interaction with human polycomb-like (hPCL) proteins. Journal of Biological Chemistry 287(13): 10509-10524, 2012

Chromatin regulated interchange between polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2)-Ezh2 and PRC2-Ezh1 complexes controls myogenin activation in skeletal muscle cells. Epigenetics and Chromatin 4: 16, 2011

Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) suppresses Eμ-myc lymphoma. Blood 122(15): 2654-2663, 2013

The polycomb repressive complex PRC2 regulates retinal differentiation in Xenopus. Developmental Biology 356(1): 181-182, 2011

linc-UBC1 physically associates with polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) and acts as a negative prognostic factor for lymph node metastasis and survival in bladder cancer. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1832(10): 1528-1537, 2013

Conservation and diversification of polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) proteins in the green lineage. Briefings in Functional Genomics 16(2): 106-119, 2016

Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) restricts hematopoietic stem cell activity. Plos Biology 6(4): E93, 2008

Keeping the gate closed: functions of the polycomb repressive complex PRC2 in development. Plant Journal 83(1): 121-132, 2016

Polycomb repressive complex 2-dependent and -independent functions of Jarid2 in transcriptional regulation in Drosophila. Molecular and Cellular Biology 32(9): 1683-1693, 2012

Coordinated regulation of transcriptional repression by the RBP2 H3K4 demethylase and Polycomb-Repressive Complex 2. Genes and Development 22(10): 1345-1355, 2008

Polycomb repressive complex PRC2 regulates Xenopus retina development downstream of Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Development 140(14): 2867-2878, 2013

Binding of different histone marks differentially regulates the activity and specificity of polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107(45): 19266-19271, 2010

Snail2/Slug cooperates with Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) to regulate neural crest development. Development 142(4): 722-731, 2015

Transcriptional Regulation of Arabidopsis Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 Coordinates Cell-Type Proliferation and Differentiation. Plant Cell 28(10): 2616-2631, 2016

Structure-Guided Design of EED Binders Allosterically Inhibiting the Epigenetic Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) Methyltransferase. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 60(1): 415-427, 2016