+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Role of ultrasound in elective abortions



Role of ultrasound in elective abortions



Journal de Gynecologie, Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction 45(10): 1477-1489



Ultrasound plays a fundamental role in the management of elective abortions. Although it can improve the quality of post-abortion care, it must not be an obstacle to abortion access. We thus studied the role of ultrasound in pregnancy dating and possible alternatives and analyzed the literature to determine the role of ultrasound in post-abortion follow-up. During an ultrasound scan, the date of conception is estimated by measurement of the crown-rump length (CRL), defined by Robinson, or of the biparietal diameter (BPD), as defined by the French Center for Fetal Ultrasound (CFEF) after 11 weeks of gestation (Robinson and CFEF curves) (grade B). Updated curves have been developed in the INTERGROWTH study. In the context of abortion, the literature recommends the application of a safety margin of 5 days, especially when the CRL and/or BPD measurement indicates a term close to 14 weeks (that is equal or below 80 and 27mm, respectively) (best practice agreement). Accordingly, with the ultrasound measurement reliable to±5 days when its performance meets the relevant criteria, an abortion can take place when the CRL measurement is less than 90mm or the BPD less than 30mm (INTERGROWTH curves) (best practice agreement). While a dating ultrasound should be encouraged, its absence is not an obstacle to scheduling an abortion for women who report that they know the date of their last menstrual period and/or of the at-risk sexual relations and for whom a clinical examination by a healthcare professional is possible (best practice agreement). In cases of intrauterine pregnancy of uncertain viability or of a pregnancy of unknown location, without any particular symptoms, the patient must be able to have a transvaginal ultrasound to increase the precision of the diagnosis (grade B). Various reviews of the literature on post-abortion follow-up indicate that the routine use of ultrasound during instrumental abortions should be avoided (best practice agreement). If it becomes clear immediately after the procedure that the endometrial thickness exceeds 8mm, immediate reaspiration is necessary. Ultrasound examination of the endometrium several days after an instrumental elective abortion does not appear to be relevant (grade B). An analysis of the literature similarly shows that routine ultrasound scans after medical abortions should be avoided. If a transvaginal ultrasound is performed after a medical abortion, it should take place at least two weeks afterwards (best practice agreement). The only aim of an ultrasound examination during follow-up should be to determine whether a gestational sac is present (best practice agreement). Finally, if an ultrasound is performed at any point during pre- or post-abortion care, a report should be drafted, specifying any potential gynecologic abnormalities found, but its absence must not delay the scheduling of the abortion (best practice agreement).

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058791721

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 27814980

DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2016.09.032


Related references

Comparison between lymphocytic infiltration in early spontaneous abortions and in elective abortions with signs of disruption at the chorio-decidual interface. Minerva Ginecologica 59(6): 585-589, 2007

Elective abortions, a right to defend. Revue de l'Infirmiere 2016(216): 16-18, 2016

The courts and elective abortions under Medicaid. Social Service Review 54(1): 124-134, 1980

Men's reactions to their partners' elective abortions. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 128(8): 831-837, 1977

Government funding for elective abortions. Progress in Clinical and Biological Research 50: 213-243, 1981

A right without access? Payment for elective abortions after Maher v. Roe. Capital University Law Review 7(3): 483-496, 1978

Elective abortions for minors: impact of the new law in France. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 130(1): 107-113, 2006

Chicago hospital agrees to stop elective abortions. Modern Healthcare 21(2): 15, 1991

Support and training of nursing teams in elective abortions. Revue de l'Infirmiere 2016(216): 28-29, 2016

The relationship between previous elective abortions and postpartum depressive reactions. Jogn Nursing; Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing 8(4): 237-240, 1979

Uterine perforation during elective first trimester abortions: a 13-year review. Singapore Medical Journal 36(1): 63-67, 1995

Single and repeated elective abortions in Japan: a psychosocial study. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology 19(3): 126-134, 1998

Medicaid assistance for elective abortions: the statutory and constitutional issues. St. John's Law Review 50(4): 751-770, 1976

Are there really alternatives to the use of fetal tissue from elective abortions in transplantation research?. New England Journal of Medicine 327(22): 1592-1595, 1992

Access to elective abortions for female prisoners under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. American Journal of Law and Medicine 37(4): 652-683, 2012