+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Simplified skeletal maturity scoring system: learning curve and methods to improve reliability



Simplified skeletal maturity scoring system: learning curve and methods to improve reliability



Spine 39(26): E1592-8



Retrospective radiographical review by 5 independent observers. To validate the intra- and interobserver reliability of the simplified skeletal maturity scoring (SSMS) system in a large cohort for each stage and for the overall cohort. The SSMS has been used to successfully predict curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis. A total of 275 patients with scoliosis (8-16 yr) with 1 hand radiograph were included from 2005 to 2011. Five participants independently scored images on 2 separate occasions using the SSMS (stage, 1-8). Observers (listed in order of increasing SSMS experience) included orthopedic surgery resident, clinical fellow (CF), research fellow, and senior faculty. Intraobserver agreement between the 2 sets of scores was estimated using the Pearson and Spearman rank correlation coefficients. Interobserver agreement was estimated with the unweighted Fleiss κ coefficient for the overall cohort and for junior (orthopedic surgery resident, CF, research fellow) versus senior faculty. Intrarater reliability for orthopedic surgery resident, CF, research fellow, senior faculty was 0.956, 0.967, 0.986, 0.991, and 0.998, respectively (Spearman). Intrarater agreement improved with greater familiarity using the SSMS. The inter-rater reliability for junior faculty (κ = 0.65), senior faculty (κ = 0.652), and the overall group (κ = 0.66) indicated agreement between all observers but no improved inter-rater agreement with experience. However, 98% of disagreements occurred only within 1 stage. Stages 2, 3, and 4 accounted for most of the variability; stage 3 was the most commonly scored stage, corresponding to peak growth velocity. The SSMS has excellent intraobserver agreement with substantial interobserver agreement. Intraobserver--but not interobserver agreement--improves with familiarity using the SSMS. Expectancy bias may contribute to a higher likelihood of assigning an SSMS 3. Discrepancies when classifying stages 2 to 4 may be resolved by improved descriptions of epiphyseal capping in stages 2 and 3. 2.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058854667

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 25503941

DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000653


Related references

Reliability and repeatability analysis of simplified skeletal maturity scoring and thumb ossification composite index in the assessment of skeletal maturity inadolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 98(43): 3479-3484, 2018

The distal radius and ulna classification in assessing skeletal maturity: a simplified scheme and reliability analysis. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics. Part B 24(6): 546-551, 2016

A comparison of the simplified olecranon and digital methods of assessment of skeletal maturity during the pubertal growth spurt. Bone & Joint Journal 96-B(11): 1556-1560, 2015

Prediction of Curve Progression in Idiopathic Scoliosis: Validation of the Sanders Skeletal Maturity Staging System. Spine 40(13): 1006-1013, 2016

Comprehensive radiographic evaluation of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: development and interrater reliability of a scoring system. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism 28(2): 88-96, 1998

An Automated System for Skeletal Maturity Assessment by Extreme Learning Machines. Plos One 10(9): E0138493-E0138493, 2016

Advantages of the computer-aided image analysis system for estimating TW skeletal maturity Increased reliability and a continuous scale. Pediatric Research 33(5 SUPPL ): S35, 1993

Comparative study to evaluate the intersystem association and reliability between standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification system and simplified pelvic organ prolapse scoring system. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India 64(6): 421-424, 2014

Prediabetes Risk Evaluation Scoring System [PRESS]: A simplified scoring system for detecting undiagnosed Prediabetes. Primary Care Diabetes 2018, 2018

A quick-scoring system for the Bender-Gestalt: Interrater reliability and scoring validity. Journal of Clinical Psychology 32(1): 86-89, 1976

RNABindRPlus: a predictor that combines machine learning and sequence homology-based methods to improve the reliability of predicted RNA-binding residues in proteins. Plos One 9(5): E97725-E97725, 2015

Scoring the bender gestalt test using the koppitz developmental system interrater reliability item difficulty and scoring implications. Perceptual & Motor Skills 60(2): 627-636, 1985

Reliability and sensitivity to change of a simplified scoring method for radiographs in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatism 40(9 SUPPL ): S287, Sept, 1997

An alternative to the balance error scoring system: using a low-cost balance board to improve the validity/reliability of sports-related concussion balance testing. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine 24(3): 256-262, 2015

The validity and reliability of an automated method of scoring dental arch relationships in unilateral cleft lip and palate using the modified Huddart-Bodenham scoring system. European Journal of Orthodontics 38(4): 353-358, 2017