EurekaMag
+ Most Popular
Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations in China
Mammalian lairs in paleo ecological studies and palynology
Studies on technological possibilities in utilization of anhydrous milk fat for production of recombined butter-like products
Should right-sided fibroelastomas be operated upon?
Large esophageal lipoma
Apoptosis in the mammalian thymus during normal histogenesis and under various in vitro and in vivo experimental conditions
Poissons characoides nouveaux ou non signales de l'Ilha do Bananal, Bresil
Desensitizing efficacy of Colgate Sensitive Maximum Strength and Fresh Mint Sensodyne dentifrices
Administration of fluid by subcutaneous infusion: revival of a forgotten method
Tundra mosquito control - an impossible dream?
Schizophrenia for primary care providers: how to contribute to the care of a vulnerable patient population
Geochemical pattern analysis; method of describing the Southeastern limestone regional aquifer system
Incidence of low birth weights in a hospital of Mexico City
Tabanidae
Graded management intensity of grassland systems for enhancing floristic diversity
Microbiology and biochemistry of cheese and fermented milk
The ember tetra: a new pygmy characid tetra from the Rio das Mortes, Brazil, Hyphessobrycon amandae sp. n. (Pisces, Characoidei)
Risk factors of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients after coronary artery intervention
Renovation of onsite domestic wastewater in a poorly drained soil
Observations of the propagation velocity and formation mechanism of burst fractures caused by gunshot
Systolic blood pressure in a population of infants in the first year of life: the Brompton study
Haematological studies in rats fed with metanil yellow
Studies on pasteurellosis. I. A new species of Pasteurella encountered in chronic fowl cholera
Dormancy breaking and germination of Acacia salicina Lindl. seeds
therapy of lupus nephritis. a two-year prospective study

Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Experiences From 1208 Cases of Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Experiences From 1208 Cases of Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy


Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Experiences From 1208 Cases of Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Experiences From 1208 Cases of Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy



Annals of Surgery 262(6): 1054-1058



ISSN/ISBN: 0003-4932

PMID: 26559780

DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000001064

Currently single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SIL-A) has become an option for treating appendicitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of SIL-A compared with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CL-A) on a large experimental cohort. Several studies had reported the safety and technical feasibility of SIL-A, albeit with a limited number of study subjects. A total of 2587 patients (1208 SIL-A and 1379 CL-A) who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy from May 2008 to April 2013 were studied retrospectively. The clinical characteristics and short-term operative outcomes of these patients were reviewed and analyzed. There were more simple type appendicitis in the SIL-A group and more complicated type appendicitis in CL-A group (81.0% vs 74.7% and 19% vs 25.3%, P <0.001, respectively). The operative time (minutes) was similar between the 2 groups (40.1 ± 18.6 vs 38.8 ± 25.2, P = 0.154). However, on subgroup analysis, operative time for simple type appendicitis was longer in the SIL-A group (36.6 ± 14.9 vs 32.3 ± 18.3, P < 0.001). The superficial incisional surgical site infection rate was higher in the SIL-A group (4.4% vs 2.3%, P = 0.003). The readmission rate was higher in the CL-A group (0.8% vs 1.7%, P = 0.042). The postoperative hospital stay (days) was shorter in the SIL-A group (3.05 ± 1.97 vs 3.35 ± 2.14, P < 0.001). In this study, SIL-A was technically feasible and safe option for appendicitis. The SIL-A group had more favorable outcomes such as shorter time to start diet and less hospital stay after surgery than the CL-A group. However, superficial incisional surgical site infection rate was higher in the SIL-A group than in the CL-A group, an effort to reduce superficial incisional SSI should be made.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058860746

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

Related references

Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy is comparable to conventional laparoscopic and laparotomic appendectomy: our single center single surgeon experience. Il Giornale di Chirurgia 34(7-8): 216-219, 2013

Meta-analysis of studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy and conventional multiport laparoscopic appendectomy. Journal of surgical research 183(2): e49-e59, 2013

Comparison of postoperative pain after needle grasper-assisted single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial (PANASILA trial). Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research 101(6): 350-359, 2021

Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy vs conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. World Journal of Gastroenterology 19(31): 5165-5173, 2013

Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surgery Today 45(9): 1179-1186, 2015

Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy for adult acute appendicitis: a Meta-analysis for randomized controlled trials. Zhong Nan da Xue Xue Bao. Yi Xue Ban 39(12): 1299-1305, 2014

Bayesian network meta-analysis of the effects of single-incision laparoscopic surgery, conventional laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy for the treatment of acute appendicitis. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 14(6): 5908-5916, 2017

Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus traditional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: an analysis of outcomes at a single institution. Surgical Endoscopy 28(2): 626-630, 2014

Comparison of transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy versus single incision laparoscopic appendectomy in children: which is the better surgical option?. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 51(8): 1288-1291, 2016

Is single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy suitable for complicated appendicitis? A comparative analysis with standard multiport laparoscopic appendectomy. Asian Journal of Surgery 43(1): 282-289, 2020

Transumbilical Single-Incision Laparoscopic-Assisted Appendectomy (TULAA) Is Useful in Adults and Young Adolescents: Comparison with Multi-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Medicina 55(6), 2019

Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy vs multiport laparoscopic appendectomy in children: a retrospective comparison. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 45(11): 2186-2190, 2010

A Technique of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy Using Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Instruments (SILACI): Preliminary Experience of 32 Cases. Indian Journal of Surgery 77(Suppl. 3): 764-768, 2015

Single-incision appendectomy is comparable to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques 22(4): 319-327, 2012

Conventional laparoscopic appendectomy versus double-incision, three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: A 1-year randomized controlled trial. Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery 11(4): 366-372, 2018