+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Single-step genomic model improved reliability and reduced the bias of genomic predictions in Danish Jersey



Single-step genomic model improved reliability and reduced the bias of genomic predictions in Danish Jersey



Journal of Dairy Science 98(12): 9026-9034



A bias in the trend of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) was observed in the Danish Jersey population where the trend of GEBV was smaller than the deregressed proofs for individuals in the validation population. This study attempted to improve the prediction reliability and reduce the bias of predicted genetic trend in Danish Jersey. The data consisted of 1,238 Danish Jersey bulls and 611,695 cows. All bulls were genotyped with the 54K chip, and 1,744 cows were genotyped with either 7K chips (1,157 individuals) or 54K chips (587 individuals). The trait used in the analysis was protein yield. All cows with EBV were used in a single-step approach. Deregressed proofs were used as the response variable. Four alternative approaches were compared with genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model with bulls in the reference data (GBLUPBull): (1) GBLUP with both bulls and genotyped cows in the reference data; (2) GBLUP including a year of birth effect; (3) GEBV from a GBLUP model that accounted for the difference of EBV between dams and maternal grandsires; and (4) using a single-step approach. The results indicated all 4 alternatives could reduce the bias of predicted genetic trend and that the single-step approach performed best. However, not all these approaches improved reliability or reduced inflation of GEBV. The reliability was 0.30 and regression coefficients of deregressed proofs on GEBV were 0.69 in the scenario GBLUPBull. When genotyped cows were included in the reference population, the regression coefficients decreased to 0.59 but the reliability increased to 0.35. If a year effect was included in the model, the prediction reliability decreased to 0.29 and the regression coefficient improved to 0.75. The method in which GEBV were adjusted for the difference between dam EBV and maternal grandsire EBV led to much lower regression coefficients though the reliability increased to 0.4. The single-step approach improved both the reliability, to 0.38 and regression coefficient to 0.78. Therefore, the bias in genetic trend was reduced. The results suggest that implementing the single-step approach is an effective way to improve genomic prediction in Danish Jersey cattle.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058861309

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26433415

DOI: 10.3168/jds.2015-9703


Related references

Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 101(9): 8076-8086, 2018

The admixed population structure in Danish Jersey dairy cattle challenges accurate genomic predictions. Journal of Animal Science 91(7): 3105-3112, 2014

Improving reliability of genomic predictions for Jersey sires using bootstrap aggregation sampling. Journal of Dairy Science 99(5): 3632-3645, 2017

Short communication: Reliability of single-step genomic BLUP breeding values by multi-trait test-day model analysis. Journal of Dairy Science 98(7): 4999-5003, 2016

Sharing reference data and including cows in the reference population improve genomic predictions in Danish Jersey. Animal 10(6): 1067-1075, 2017

Genomic predictions across Nordic Holstein and Nordic Red using the genomic best linear unbiased prediction model with different genomic relationship matrices. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 131(4): 249-257, 2015

Implications of SNP weighting on single-step genomic predictions for different reference population sizes. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 134(6): 463-471, 2017

The Accuracy and Bias of Single-Step Genomic Prediction for Populations Under Selection. G3 7(8): 2685-2694, 2017

Considering dominance in reduced single-step genomic evaluations. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 135(3): 151-158, 2018

Metafounders are related to F st fixation indices and reduce bias in single-step genomic evaluations. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 49(1): 34, 2017

Different genomic relationship matrices for single-step analysis using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 43: 1, 2011

Reducing bias in the dairy cattle single-step genomic evaluation by ignoring bulls without progeny. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 135(2): 107-115, 2018

Scaling the genomic relationship matrix for single-step evaluation using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information. Journal of Dairy Science 93: 532-532, 2010

Hot topic: Use of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) with a large number of genotypes. Journal of Dairy Science 98(6): 4090-4094, 2016

Use of genomic recursions and algorithm for proven and young animals for single-step genomic BLUP analyses--a simulation study. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 132(5): 340-345, 2016