+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Sparing Sphincters and Laparoscopic Resection Improve Survival by Optimizing the Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Patients



Sparing Sphincters and Laparoscopic Resection Improve Survival by Optimizing the Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Patients



Medicine 95(5): E2669



The goal of rectal cancer treatment is to minimize the local recurrence rate and extend the disease-free survival period and survival. For this aim, obtainment of negative circumferential radial margin (CRM) plays an important role. This study evaluated predictive factors for positive CRM status and its effect on patient survival in mid- and distal rectal tumors.Patients who underwent curative resection for rectal cancer were included. The main factors were demographic data, tumor location, surgical technique, neoadjuvant therapy, tumor diameter, tumor depth, lymph node metastasis, mesorectal integrity, CRM, the rate of local recurrence, distant metastasis, and overall and disease-free survival. Statistical analyses were performed by using the Chi-squared test, Fisher exact test, Student t test, Mann-Whitney U test and the Mantel-Cox log-rank sum test.A total of 420 patients were included, 232 (55%) of whom were male. We observed no significant differences in patient characteristics or surgical treatment between the patients who had positive CRM and who had negative CRM, but a higher positive CRM rate was observed in patients undergone abdominoperineal resection (APR) (P < 0.001). Advanced T-stage (P < 0.001), lymph node invasion (P = 0.001) and incomplete mesorectum (P = 0.007) were encountered significantly more often in patients with positive CRM status. Logistic regression analysis revealed that APR (P < 0.001) and open resection (P = 0.046) were independent predictors of positive CRM status. Moreover, positive CRM was associated with decreased 5-year overall and disease-free survival (P = 0.002 and P = 0.004, respectively).This large single-institution series demonstrated that APR and open resection were independent predictive factors for positive CRM status in rectal cancer. Positive CRM independently decreased the 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058881594

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26844498

DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000002669


Related references

Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement after Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer. 2011

Circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity after MRI assessment and adjuvant treatment in 189 patients undergoing rectal cancer resection. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 29(5): 585-590, 2014

Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer and circumferential margin: is it time to move on?. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 54(8): 1049-1052, 2011

Circumferential resection margin involvement in stage III rectal cancer patients treated with curative resection followed by chemoradiotherapy: a surrogate marker for local recurrence?. Yonsei Medical Journal 54(1): 131-138, 2014

Circumferential resection margin involvement after laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer. Colorectal Disease 14(4): 431-437, 2012

Effect of the circumferential resection margin on survival following rectal cancer surgery. British Journal of Surgery 98(4): 573-581, 2011

Benchmarking circumferential resection margin (R1) resection rate for rectal cancer in the neoadjuvant era. Colorectal Disease 12(9): 909-913, 2010

The Influence of the Distal Resection Margin Length on Local Recurrence and long- term Survival in Patients with Rectal Cancer after Chemoradiotherapy and Sphincter- Preserving Rectal Resection. Radiology and Oncology 51(2): 169-177, 2016

What is the best way to predict disease-free survival after preoperative radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer patients: tumor regression grading, nodal status, or circumferential resection margin invasion?. Journal of Clinical Oncology 24(8): 1319; Author Reply 1320-1, 2006

PTH-311 The significance of a positive lymph node at the circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer does it reduce survival?. Gut 64(Suppl 1): A546.1-A546, 2015

Rectal cancer within 10 cm. Comparison of the radicality of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques with regard to the circumferential resection margin and the completeness of mesorectal excision. Rozhledy V Chirurgii 92(6): 312-319, 2015

Occurrence and prognostic value of circumferential resection margin involvement for patients with rectal cancer. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 24(4): 385-390, 2009

The Prognostic Value of Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Patients with Extraperitoneal Rectal Cancer. American Surgeon 82(4): 348-355, 2016

Does circumferential tumor location affect the circumferential resection margin status in mid and low rectal cancer?. Asian Journal of Surgery 41(3): 257-263, 2017

Role of total mesorectal excision and of circumferential resection margin in local recurrence and survival of patients with rectal carcinoma. Digestive Diseases 25(1): 51-55, 2007