+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Technical Note: Phantom study to evaluate the dose and image quality effects of a computed tomography organ-based tube current modulation technique

Technical Note: Phantom study to evaluate the dose and image quality effects of a computed tomography organ-based tube current modulation technique

Medical Physics 42(11): 6572-6578

This technical note quantifies the dose and image quality performance of a clinically available organ-dose-based tube current modulation (ODM) technique, using experimental and simulation phantom studies. The investigated ODM implementation reduces the tube current for the anterior source positions, without increasing current for posterior positions, although such an approach was also evaluated for comparison. Axial CT scans at 120 kV were performed on head and chest phantoms on an ODM-equipped scanner (Optima CT660, GE Healthcare, Chalfont St. Giles, England). Dosimeters quantified dose to breast, lung, heart, spine, eye lens, and brain regions for ODM and 3D-modulation (SmartmA) settings. Monte Carlo simulations, validated with experimental data, were performed on 28 voxelized head phantoms and 10 chest phantoms to quantify organ dose and noise standard deviation. The dose and noise effects of increasing the posterior tube current were also investigated. ODM reduced the dose for all experimental dosimeters with respect to SmartmA, with average dose reductions across dosimeters of 31% (breast), 21% (lung), 24% (heart), 6% (spine), 19% (eye lens), and 11% (brain), with similar results for the simulation validation study. In the phantom library study, the average dose reduction across all phantoms was 34% (breast), 20% (lung), 8% (spine), 20% (eye lens), and 8% (brain). ODM increased the noise standard deviation in reconstructed images by 6%-20%, with generally greater noise increases in anterior regions. Increasing the posterior tube current provided similar dose reduction as ODM for breast and eye lens, increased dose to the spine, with noise effects ranging from 2% noise reduction to 16% noise increase. At noise equal to SmartmA, ODM increased the estimated effective dose by 4% and 8% for chest and head scans, respectively. Increasing the posterior tube current further increased the effective dose by 15% (chest) and 18% (head) relative to SmartmA. ODM reduced dose in all experimental and simulation studies over a range of phantoms, while increasing noise. The results suggest a net dose/noise benefit for breast and eye lens for all studied phantoms, negligible lung dose effects for two phantoms, increased lung dose and/or noise for eight phantoms, and increased dose and/or noise for brain and spine for all studied phantoms compared to the reference protocol.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058977996

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26520748

DOI: 10.1118/1.4933197

Related references

New organ-based tube current modulation method to reduce the radiation dose during computed tomography of the head: evaluation of image quality and radiation dose to the eyes in the phantom study. La Radiologia Medica 122(8): 601-608, 2017

Automatic Tube Current Modulation and Tube Voltage Selection in Pediatric Computed Tomography: A Phantom Study on Radiation Dose and Image Quality. Investigative Radiology 54(5): 265-272, 2019

The application of automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) on image quality and radiation dose at abdominal computed tomography (CT): A phantom study. Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology 21(4): 453-464, 2013

Radiation exposure and image quality of normal computed tomography brain images acquired with automated and organ-based tube current modulation multiband filtering and iterative reconstruction. Investigative Radiology 47(3): 202-207, 2012

Physical validation of a Monte Carlo-based, phantom-derived approach to computed tomography organ dosimetry under tube current modulation. Medical Physics 44(10): 5423-5432, 2017

Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study. Academic Radiology 16(8): 997, 2009

Comparative Study of Volume Computed Tomography Dose Index and Size-Specific Dose Estimate Head in Computed Tomography Examination for Adult Patients Based on the Mode of Automatic Tube Current Modulation. Medical Science Monitor 25: 71-76, 2019

Evaluation of dose output according to the objects using organ-based tube-current modulation in thoracic computed tomography. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 70(11): 1297-1303, 2014

Reduced Patient Dose and Improved Image Quality in Computed Tomography Examinations with On-Line Anatomically Adapted Tube Current Modulation. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 80(1): 287-289, 1998

Dose reduction to anterior surfaces with organ-based tube-current modulation: evaluation of performance in a phantom study. Ajr. American Journal of Roentgenology 197(3): 689-695, 2011

Topogram-based tube current modulation of head computed tomography for optimizing image quality while protecting the eye lens with shielding. Acta Radiologica 60(1): 61-67, 2019

Image quality and age-specific dose estimation in head and chest CT examinations with organ-based tube-current modulation. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 157(2): 193-205, 2013

Comparison of Organ-Based Tube Current Modulation and Bismuth Shielding in Chest Ct: Effect on the Image Quality and the Patient Dose. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 185(1): 42-48, 2019

Assessment of image quality on effects of varying tube voltage and automatic tube current modulation with hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques in abdominal/pelvic CT: a phantom study. Investigative Radiology 48(3): 167-174, 2013

Image noise and radiation dose using an automatic tube current modulation technique at 64-detector computed tomography: effect of off-center patient position, bowtie filter type, and scan projection radiograph. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 33(6): 973-977, 2010