+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The Effect of Flattening Filter Free on Three-dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3D-CRT), Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT), and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) Plans for Metastatic Brain Tumors from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer



The Effect of Flattening Filter Free on Three-dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3D-CRT), Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT), and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) Plans for Metastatic Brain Tumors from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer



Health Physics 109(1): 1-9



Flattening filter free (FFF) may affect outcome measures of radiotherapy. The objective of this study is to compare the dosimetric parameters in three types of radiotherapy plans, three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), with or without the flattening filter (FF), developed for the treatment of metastatic brain tumors from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). From July 2013 to October 2013, 3D-CRT, IMRT, and VMAT treatment plans were designed using 6 MV and 10 MV, with and without FF, for 10 patients with brain metastasis from NSCLC. The evaluation of the treatment plans included homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), monitor units (MU), mean dose (Dmean), treatment time, and the influence of FFF on volumes. There was no difference in CI or HI between FFF and FF models with 3D-CRT, IMRT, and VMAT plans. At 6 MV, a lower Dmean was seen in the FFF model of 3D-CRT and in the VMAT plan at 10 MV. In the IMRT 6 MV, IMRT 10 MV, and VMAT 10 MV plans, higher MUs were seen in the FFF models. FFF treatments are similar in quality to FF plans, generally lead to more monitor units, and are associated with shorter treatment times. FFF plans ranked by the order of superiority in terms of a time advantage are VMAT, 3D-CRT, and IMRT.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 059001677

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26011493

DOI: 10.1097/hp.0000000000000278


Related references

A comprehensive dosimetric study of pancreatic cancer treatment using three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric-modulated radiation therapy (VMAT), and passive-scattering and modulated-scanning proton therapy (PT). Medical Dosimetry 39(2): 139-145, 2015

In-vitro investigation of out-of-field cell survival following the delivery of conformal, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans. Physics in Medicine and Biology 57(20): 6635-6645, 2013

Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans for the treatment of glioma using flattening filter-free and flattening filter modes. Oncology Letters 13(5): 3451-3456, 2017

A Comparison of Non-coplanar Three-dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy, Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy, and Volumetric Modulated Radiation Therapy for the Delivery of Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy to Peripheral Lung Cancer. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences 48(4): 360-369, 2019

Temporal characterization and in vitro comparison of cell survival following the delivery of 3D-conformal, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Physics in Medicine and Biology 56(8): 2445-2457, 2011

Volumetric-modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning for prostate cancer with flattened beam and flattening filter free linear accelerators. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics 18(5): 307-314, 2017

Comparison of three dimensional conformal radiation therapy, intensity modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy for low radiation exposure of normal tissue in patients with prostate cancer. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 16(8): 3365-3370, 2016

Comparison of 3D Conformal Radiation Therapy (3DCRT) and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) in Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). International Journal of Radiation Oncology*biology*physics 84(3): S597-S598, 2012

Accuracy of real-time couch tracking during 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, intensity modulated radiation therapy, and volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics 85(1): 237-242, 2013

Dosimetric, Radiobiological and Secondary Cancer Risk Evaluation in Head-and-Neck Three-dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy, Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy, and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy: A Phantom Study. Journal of Medical Physics 43(2): 129-135, 2018

Comparison of testicular dose delivered by intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients with prostate cancer. Medical Dosimetry 40(3): 186-189, 2016

A Retrospective Planning Analysis Comparing Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) to Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Radiotherapy Treatment of Prostate Cancer. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences 44(2): 79-86, 2019

Intrafraction Motion in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Versus Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics 95(2): 835-843, 2017

Volumetric modulated arc therapy with flattening filter free (FFF) beams for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with medically inoperable early stage non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). RadioTherapy and Oncology 107(3): 414-418, 2014

Dosimetric Impact of Leaf Gap Error on Target Dose Using Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy with Flattening Filter-Free Beam. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*biology*physics 99(2): E733-E734, 2017