+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The Effects of Hearing Aid Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction Processing on Listening Effort in Older Adults with Hearing Loss

The Effects of Hearing Aid Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction Processing on Listening Effort in Older Adults with Hearing Loss

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 27(1): 29-41

Older listeners with hearing loss may exert more cognitive resources to maintain a level of listening performance similar to that of younger listeners with normal hearing. Unfortunately, this increase in cognitive load, which is often conceptualized as increased listening effort, may come at the cost of cognitive processing resources that might otherwise be available for other tasks. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the independent and combined effects of a hearing aid directional microphone and a noise reduction (NR) algorithm on reducing the listening effort older listeners with hearing loss expend on a speech-in-noise task. Participants were fitted with study worn commercially available behind-the-ear hearing aids. Listening effort on a sentence recognition in noise task was measured using an objective auditory-visual dual-task paradigm. The primary task required participants to repeat sentences presented in quiet and in a four-talker babble. The secondary task was a digital visual pursuit rotor-tracking test, for which participants were instructed to use a computer mouse to track a moving target around an ellipse that was displayed on a computer screen. Each of the two tasks was presented separately and concurrently at a fixed overall speech recognition performance level of 50% correct with and without the directional microphone and/or the NR algorithm activated in the hearing aids. In addition, participants reported how effortful it was to listen to the sentences in quiet and in background noise in the different hearing aid listening conditions. Fifteen older listeners with mild sloping to severe sensorineural hearing loss participated in this study. Listening effort in background noise was significantly reduced with the directional microphones activated in the hearing aids. However, there was no significant change in listening effort with the hearing aid NR algorithm compared to no noise processing. Correlation analysis between objective and self-reported ratings of listening effort showed no significant relation. Directional microphone processing effectively reduced the cognitive load of listening to speech in background noise. This is significant because it is likely that listeners with hearing impairment will frequently encounter noisy speech in their everyday communications.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 059004213

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26809324

DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.15030

Related references

Efficacy and Effectiveness of Advanced Hearing Aid Directional and Noise Reduction Technologies for Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss. Ear and Hearing 40(4): 805-822, 2019

The effect of hearing aid noise reduction on listening effort in hearing-impaired adults. Ear and Hearing 35(6): 600-610, 2014

Effects of Noise on Speech Recognition and Listening Effort in Children With Normal Hearing and Children With Mild Bilateral or Unilateral Hearing Loss. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 59(5): 1218-1232, 2016

Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss. Otology and Neurotology 34(6): 1064-1070, 2013

Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids. Ear and Hearing, 2017

Speech perception with hearing aids: Effects of noise reduction and directional microphone systems on amplified signals. Audiological Medicine 7(2): 106-111, 2009

Relating hearing loss and executive functions to hearing aid users' preference for, and speech recognition with, different combinations of binaural noise reduction and microphone directionality. Frontiers in Neuroscience 8: 391, 2014

The Effects of Noise and Reverberation on Listening Effort in Adults With Normal Hearing. Ear and Hearing 37(1): 1-13, 2016

Effect of speaker age on speech recognition and perceived listening effort in older adults with hearing loss. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 55(3): 838-847, 2012

The effects of a hearing education program on recreational noise exposure, attitudes and beliefs toward noise, hearing loss, and hearing protector devices in young adults. Noise and Health 17(78): 253-262, 2015

Simulations of hearing loss and hearing aid: effects on electrophysiological correlates of listening effort. Conference Proceedings 2011: 2319-2322, 2011

Signal-to-noise ratio loss and directional-microphone hearing aids. Seminars in Hearing 21(2): 179-200, 2000

An evidence-based systematic review of directional microphones and digital noise reduction hearing aids in school-age children with hearing loss. American Journal of Audiology 21(2): 295-312, 2012

Effects of noise reduction on speech intelligibility, perceived listening effort, and personal preference in hearing-impaired listeners. Trends in Hearing 18:, 2014

Hearing in young adults. Part I: The effects of attitudes and beliefs toward noise, hearing loss, and hearing protector devices. Noise and Health 17(78): 237-244, 2015