+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The association between handheld phone bans and the prevalence of handheld phone conversations among young drivers in the United States



The association between handheld phone bans and the prevalence of handheld phone conversations among young drivers in the United States



Annals of Epidemiology 26(12): 833-837.E1



Fourteen US states and the District of Columbia have banned handheld phone use for all drivers. We examined whether such legislation was associated with reduced handheld phone conversations among drivers aged younger than 25 years. Data from the 2008 to 2013 National Occupant Protection Use Survey were merged with states' legislation. The outcome was roadside-observed handheld phone conversation at stop signs or lights. Logistic regression was used. A total of 32,784 young drivers were observed. Relative to drivers who were observed in states without a universal handheld phone ban, the adjusted odds ratio of phone conversation was 0.42 (95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.53) for drivers who were observed in states with bans. The relative reduction in phone conversation was 46% (23%, 61%) for laws that were effective less than 1 year, 55% (32%, 70%) for 1-2 years, 63% (51%, 72%) for 2 years or more, relative to no laws. Universal handheld phone bans may be effective at reducing handheld phone use among young drivers.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 059041499

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 27894566

DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.10.002


Related references

Long-term effects of handheld cell phone laws on driver handheld cell phone use. Traffic Injury Prevention 11(2): 133-141, 2010

The impact of legislation in Ireland on handheld mobile phone use by drivers. Irish Medical Journal 101(7): 221-222, 2008

Is a hands-free phone safer than a handheld phone?. Journal of Safety Research 40(2): 157-164, 2009

Longer term effects of New York State's law on drivers' handheld cell phone use. Injury Prevention 10(1): 11-15, 2004

Drivers' use of handheld cell phones before and after New York State's cell phone law. Preventive Medicine 36(5): 629-635, 2003

Mobile phone and handheld microscopes for public health applications. Lancet. Public Health 2(8): E355, 2018

Mobile-phone and handheld microscopy for neglected tropical diseases. Plos Neglected Tropical Diseases 11(7): E0005550, 2017

Mobile phone use-effects of handheld and handsfree phones on driving performance. Accident; Analysis and Prevention 37(5): 902-909, 2005

Epidemiology of Handheld Cell Phone Use While Driving: A Study from a South Indian City. International Journal of Preventive Medicine 9: 29, 2018

Comparing handheld and hands-free cell phone usage behaviors while driving. Traffic Injury Prevention 15 Suppl 1: S21-S26, 2015

Effect of handheld mobile phone use on parotid gland salivary flow rate and volume. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology 114(2): 200-206, 2013

Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography as interpreted on a mobile handheld phone device. Jacc. Cardiovascular Imaging 3(5): 482-490, 2010

Accuracy of Mobile Phone and Handheld Light Microscopy for the Diagnosis of Schistosomiasis and Intestinal Protozoa Infections in Côte d'Ivoire. Plos Neglected Tropical Diseases 10(6): E0004768, 2017

The application of a handheld personal digital assistant with camera and mobile phone card (Wellnavi) to the general population in a dietary survey. Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology 53(2): 109-116, 2007

A parametric duration model of the reaction times of drivers distracted by mobile phone conversations. Accident; Analysis and Prevention 62: 42-53, 2014