Home
  >  
Section 60
  >  
Chapter 59,056

The early outcome of kinematic versus mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised control trial

Waterson, H.B.; Clement, N.D.; Eyres, K.S.; Mandalia, V.I.; Toms, A.D.

Bone and Joint Journal 98-B(10): 1360-1368

2016


ISSN/ISBN: 2049-4408
PMID: 27694590
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.98b10.36862
Accession: 059055105

Download citation:  
Text
  |  
BibTeX
  |  
RIS

Our aim was to compare kinematic with mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We performed a prospective blinded randomised controlled trial to compare the functional outcome of patients undergoing TKA in mechanical alignment (MA) with those in kinematic alignment (KA). A total of 71 patients undergoing TKA were randomised to either kinematic (n = 36) or mechanical alignment (n = 35). Pre- and post-operative hip-knee-ankle radiographs were analysed. The knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), American Knee Society Score, Short Form-36, Euro-Qol (EQ-5D), range of movement (ROM), two minute walk, and timed up and go tests were assessed pre-operatively and at six weeks, three and six months and one year post-operatively. A total of 78% of the kinematically aligned group (28 patients) and 77% of the mechanically aligned group (27 patients) were within 3° of their pre-operative plan. There were no statistically significant differences in the mean KOOS (difference 1.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) -9.4 to 12.1, p = 0.80), EQ-5D (difference 0.8, 95% CI -7.9 to 9.6, p = 0.84), ROM (difference 0.1, 95% CI -6.0 to 6.1, p = 0.99), two minute distance tolerance (difference 20.0, 95% CI -52.8 to 92.8, p = 0.58), or timed up and go (difference 0.78, 95% CI -2.3 to 3.9, p = 0.62) between the groups at one year. Kinematically aligned TKAs appear to have comparable short-term results to mechanically aligned TKAs with no significant differences in function one year post-operatively. Further research is required to see if any theoretical long-term functional benefits of kinematic alignment are realised or if there are any potential effects on implant survival. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1360-8.

PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90