+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The effect of inter-implant distance on retention and resistance to dislodging forces for mandibular implant-tissue-supported overdentures

The effect of inter-implant distance on retention and resistance to dislodging forces for mandibular implant-tissue-supported overdentures

Journal of Dentistry 11(5): 506-515

The effect of inter-implant distance on retention and resistance of implant-tissue-supported overdentures is lacking in the literature. An in vitro study was performed to evaluate this effect for mandibular implant-tissue-supported overdentures retained by two ball attachments. An acrylic cast of an edentulous mandible was fabricated. Three pairs of implants were symmetrically placed at both sides of the midline. The inter-implant distance was 10, 25, and 35 millimeters in positions A, B and C, respectively. A framework simulating the overdenture was fabricated on the cast. Six attachment housings were placed within the overdenture. For each sample, two ball abutments were screwed onto the implant pairs and two pink nylon inserts were seated in their respective attachment housings. The samples were tested in three groups of 15 (A, B, and C). The testing machine applied tensile dislodging forces and peak loads were measured in three directions: vertical, oblique, and anterior-posterior. A one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's HSD was used to determine groups that were significantly different. Tests were carried out at 0.05 level of significance. Peak loads for the anterior-posteriorly directed dislodging forces were significantly the highest for group C (P<0.05); 21.25 N±3.05 N, while there were no statistically significant differences among groups with vertically and obliquely directed forces (P>0.05). Inter-implant distance did not affect the vertical retention and oblique resistance of mandibular implant-tissue-supported overdentures; however, it affected anterior-posterior resistance.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 059058295

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 25628676

Related references

Two-Implant-Supported Mandibular Overdentures: Do Clinical Denture Quality and Inter-Implant Distance Affect Patient Satisfaction?. International Journal of Prosthodontics 30(6): 519–525, 2018

Effect of Distal Implant Inclination on Dislodging Forces of Different Locator Attachments Used for Mandibular Overdentures: An In Vitro Study. Journal of Prosthodontics 28(2): E666-E674, 2019

Effect of Cyclic Dislodging on the Retention of Two Attachment Systems for Implant-supported Overdentures: An In Vitro Study. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 19(11): 1386-1392, 2018

Clinical evaluation of inter-implant distance influence on the wear characteristics of low-profile stud attachments used in mandibular implant‑retained overdentures. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry 11(1): E33-E41, 2019

Implant overdentures: bar versus ball attachment for mandibular implant supported overdentures--a randomised clinical trial. Sadj 59(1): 28-29, 2004

The effect of varying implant position in immediately loaded implant-supported mandibular overdentures. Journal of Oral Implantology 39(3): 345-354, 2013

Influence of Implant Positions and Occlusal Forces on Peri-Implant Bone Stress in Mandibular Two-Implant Overdentures: A 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Journal of Oral Implantology 43(6): 419-428, 2017

Effect of implant number on the movement of mandibular implant-supported overdentures under biting force: An in-vitro study. Quintessence International 49(9): 709-717, 2018

Effect of attachment type on load distribution to implant abutments and the residual ridge in mandibular implant-supported overdentures. Journal of Dental Biomechanics 6: 1758736015576009, 2015

Effect of implant angulation on attachment retention in mandibular two-implant overdentures: a clinical study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 16(4): 565-571, 2014

Effect of two designs of implant-supported overdentures on peri-implant and posterior mandibular bone resorptions: a 5-year prospective radiographic study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 28(10): E184-E192, 2017

Effect of Labial Implant Inclination on the Retention and Stability of Different Resilient Stud Attachments for Mandibular Implant Overdentures: An In vitro Study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 34(2): 381–389, 2019

Effect of Different Degrees of Mesial Implant Inclination on the Retention and Stability of Two-Implant Mandibular Overdentures Retained with Stud Attachments: An In Vitro Study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 33(2): 259–268, 2018

Effect of implant loading protocols on failure and marginal bone loss with unsplinted two-implant-supported mandibular overdentures: systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 47(5): 642-650, 2018

Effect of dislodging forces on mandibular implant attachment-retained overdenture. Implant Dentistry 20(3): 246-254, 2011