+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The effects of changes in utilization and technological advancements of cross-sectional imaging on radiologist workload



The effects of changes in utilization and technological advancements of cross-sectional imaging on radiologist workload



Academic Radiology 22(9): 1191-1198



To examine the effect of changes in utilization and advances in cross-sectional imaging on radiologists' workload. All computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations performed at a single institution between 1999 and 2010 were identified and associated with the total number of images for each examination. Annual trends in institutional numbers of interpreted examinations and images were translated to changes in daily workload for the individual radiologist by normalizing to the number of dedicated daily CT and MRI work assignments, assuming a 255-day/8-hour work day schedule. Temporal changes in institutional and individual workload were assessed by Sen's slope analysis (Q = median slope) and Mann-Kendall test (Z = Z statistic). From 1999 to 2010, a total of 1,517,149 cross-sectional imaging studies (CT = 994,471; MRI = 522,678) comprising 539,210,581 images (CT = 339,830,947; MRI = 199,379,634) were evaluated at our institution. Total annual cross-sectional studies steadily increased from 84,409 in 1999 to 147,336 in 2010, representing a twofold increase in workload (Q = 6465/year, Z = 4.2, P < .0001). Concomitantly, the number of annual departmental cross-sectional images interpreted increased from 9,294,140 in 1990 to 94,271,551 in 2010, representing a 10-fold increase (Q = 8707876/year, Z = 4.5, P < .0001). Adjusting for staffing changes, the number of images requiring interpretation per minute of every workday per staff radiologist increased from 2.9 in 1999 to 16.1 in 2010 (Q = 1.7/year, Z = 4.3, P < .0001). Imaging volumes have grown at a disproportionate rate to imaging utilization increases at our institution. The average radiologist interpreting CT or MRI examinations must now interpret one image every 3-4 seconds in an 8-hour workday to meet workload demands.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 059062605

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26210525

DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.05.007


Related references

Cross-sectional imaging of primary thoracic sarcomas with histopathologic correlation: a review for the radiologist. Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology 39(1): 17-29, 2010

Cardiac drugs used in cross-sectional cardiac imaging: what the radiologist needs to know. Clinical Radiology 65(9): 677-684, 2010

Re.: Cardiac drugs used in cross-sectional cardiac imaging: what the radiologist needs to know. Clinical Radiology 66(5): 485, 2011

The evolving role of the radiologist: the Vancouver workload utilization evaluation study. Journal of the American College of Radiology 10(10): 764-769, 2013

Toward optometric utilization of technological advancements. Journal of the American Optometric Association 42(4): 338-345, 1971

Cancer in pregnancy: cross-sectional oncologic imaging utilization at a tertiary care center with an algorithmic approach to imaging. Clinical Imaging 36(6): 780-790, 2013

Technological advancements in wood harvesting and utilization. 1980

Recent technological advancements in cardiac ultrasound imaging. Ultrasonics 84: 329-340, 2018

Health IT and inappropriate utilization of outpatient imaging: A cross-sectional study of U.S. hospitals. International Journal of Medical Informatics 109: 87-95, 2018

Health IT and inappropriate utilization of outpatient imaging: A cross-sectional study of U.S. hospitals. International Journal of Medical Informatics 109: 87-95, 2018

Technological advancements spur interest in ultrasound diagnostic imaging. Modern Healthcare 18(22): 136, 1988

Measuring and managing radiologist workload: a method for quantifying radiologist activities and calculating the full-time equivalents required to operate a service. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology 57(5): 551-557, 2013

Global and Japanese regional variations in radiologist potential workload for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging examinations. Japanese Journal of Radiology 36(4): 273-281, 2018

Radiologist-patient contact during the performance of cross-sectional examinations. Journal of the American College of Radiology 1(3): 162-163, 2004

A review of cross-sectional imaging, ultrasound and nuclear medicine utilization patterns in paediatric patients in Ireland, 2003-12. British Journal of Radiology 88(1048): 20140767, 2015