+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The efficacy and safety of prone positioning in adults patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials



The efficacy and safety of prone positioning in adults patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials



Journal of Thoracic Disease 7(3): 356-367



Prone positioning for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has no impact on mortality despite significant improvements in oxygenation. However, a recent trial demonstrated reduced mortality rates in the prone position for severe ARDS. We evaluated effects of prone position duration and protective lung strategies on mortality rates in ARDS. We extensively searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on prone positioning during acute respiratory failure in adults for inclusion in our meta-analysis. Eight trials met our inclusion criteria, Totals of 1,099 and 1,042 patients were randomized to the prone and supine ventilation positions. The mortality rates associated with the prone and supine positions were 41% and 47% [risk ratio (RR), 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.82-0.98, P=0.02], but the heterogeneity was moderate (P=0.01, I(2)=61%). In a subgroup analysis, the mortality rates for lung protective ventilation (RR 0.73, 95% CI, 0.62-0.86, P=0.0002) and duration of prone positioning >12 h (RR 0.75, 95% CI, 0.65-0.87, P<0.0001) were reduced in the prone position. Prone positioning was not associated with an increased incidence of cardiac events (RR 1.01, 95% CI, 0.87-1.17) or ventilator associated pneumonia (RR 0.88, 95% CI, 0.71-1.09), but it was associated with an increased incidence of pressure sores (RR 1.23, 95% CI, 1.07-1.41) and endotracheal dislocation (RR 1.33, 95% CI, 1.02-1.74). Prone positioning tends to reduce the mortality rates in ARDS patients, especially when used in conjunction with a lung protective strategy and longer prone position durations. Prone positioning for ARDS patients should be prioritized over other invasive procedures because related life-threatening complications are rare. However, further additional randomized controlled design to study are required for confirm benefit of prone position in ARDS.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 059064898

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 25922713

DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.12.49


Related references

The effect of prone positioning on mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Critical Care 18(3): R109, 2014

The efficacy and safety of prone positional ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: updated study-level meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials. Critical Care Medicine 42(5): 1252-1262, 2014

Efficacy and safety of prone positioning for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Journal of Advanced Nursing 32(4): 922-929, 2000

Prone positioning in patients with moderate and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 302(18): 1977-1984, 2009

Effect of prone positioning in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis. Critical Care Medicine 36(2): 603-609, 2008

Effect of sivelestat sodium in patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Bmc Pulmonary Medicine 17(1): 148, 2017

Neuromuscular blocking agents for adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 85(6): 1102-1109, 2018

Effect of surfactant administration on outcomes of adult patients in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Bmc Pulmonary Medicine 19(1): 9, 2019

Efficacy and safety of ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology 45(2): 122-126, 2018

Prone positioning in hypoxemic respiratory failure: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Critical Care 24(1): 89, 2009

Optimal duration of prone positioning in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Bmj Open 8(9): E021408, 2018

Effect of prone positioning during mechanical ventilation on mortality among patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cmaj 186(10): E381-E390, 2014

Albuterol in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Journal of Emergency Medicine 6(3): 165-171, 2015

Enteral omega-3 fatty acid supplementation in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Intensive Care Medicine 40(4): 504-512, 2014

The use of Rheum Palmatum L . in the Treatment of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: a Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials. African Journal of Traditional Complementary and Alternative Medicines 14(2): 334-347, 2017