+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The prevalence and health consequences of frailty in a population-based older home care cohort: a comparison of different measures



The prevalence and health consequences of frailty in a population-based older home care cohort: a comparison of different measures



Bmc Geriatrics 16: 133



Evaluating different approaches to identifying frail home care clients at heightened risk for adverse health outcomes is an important but understudied area. Our objectives were to determine the prevalence and correlates of frailty (as operationally defined by three measures) in a home care cohort, the agreement between these measures, and their predictive validity for several outcomes assessed over one year. We conducted a retrospective cohort study with linked population-based administrative and clinical (Resident Assessment Instrument [RAI]) data for all long-stay home care clients (aged 66+) assessed between April 2010-2013 in Ontario, Canada (n = 234,552). We examined two versions of a frailty index (FI), a full and modified FI, and the CHESS scale, compared their baseline characteristics and their predictive accuracy (by calculating the area under the ROC curve [AUC]) for death, long-term care (LTC) admission, and hospitalization endpoints in models adjusted for age, sex and comorbidity. Frailty prevalence varied by measure (19.5, 24.4 and 44.1 %, for full FI, modified FI and CHESS, respectively) and was similar among female and male clients. All three measures were associated with a significantly increased risk of death, LTC admission and hospitalization endpoints in adjusted analyses but their addition to base models resulted in modest improvement for most AUC estimates. There were significant differences between measures in predictive accuracy, with the full FI demonstrating a higher AUC for LTC admission and CHESS a higher AUC for hospitalization - although none of the measures performed well for the hospitalization endpoints. The different approaches to detecting vulnerability resulted in different estimates of frailty prevalence among home care clients in Ontario. Although all three measures were significant predictors of the health outcomes examined, the gains in predictive accuracy were often modest with the exception of the full FI in predicting LTC admission. Our findings provide some support for the clinical utility of a comprehensive FI measure and also illustrate that it is feasible to derive such a measure at the population level using routinely collected data. This may facilitate further research on frailty in this setting, including the development and evaluation of interventions for frailty.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 059094903

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 27388294

DOI: 10.1186/s12877-016-0309-z


Related references

Influence of Poor Oral Health on Physical Frailty: A Population-Based Cohort Study of Older British Men. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 66(3): 473-479, 2018

Specifying the content of home-based health behaviour change interventions for older people with frailty or at risk of frailty: an exploratory systematic review. Bmj Open 7(2): E014127, 2017

Frailty and health care use among community-dwelling older adults with diabetes: a population-based study. Clinical Interventions in Aging 13: 2295-2300, 2018

Health care outcomes and advance care planning in older adults who receive home-based palliative care: a pilot cohort study. Journal of Palliative Medicine 18(1): 38-44, 2015

Discrimination ability of comorbidity, frailty, and subjective health to predict mortality in community-dwelling older people: Population based prospective cohort study. European Journal of Internal Medicine 42: 29-38, 2017

Prevalence of sarcopenia in a population of nursing home residents according to their frailty status: results of the SENIOR cohort. Journal of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions 17(3): 209-217, 2018

A comparison between physical and biopsychosocial measures of frailty: Prevalence and associated factors in Brazilian older adults. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 81: 111-118, 2019

Prevalence and correlates of frailty in an older rural African population: findings from the HAALSI cohort study. Bmc Geriatrics 17(1): 293, 2017

Prevalence of frailty among community dwelling older adults in receipt of low level home support: a cross-sectional analysis of the North Dublin Cohort. Bmc Geriatrics 17(1): 121, 2017

A comparison of the relationship of 14 performance-based measures with frailty in older women. Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism 36(6): 928-938, 2011

Prevalence of frailty indicators and association with socioeconomic status in middle-aged and older adults in a swiss region with universal health insurance coverage: a population-based cross-sectional study. Journal of Aging Research 2014: 198603, 2014

Social and behavioural factors associated with frailty trajectories in a population-based cohort of older adults. Bmj Open 6(5): E011410, 2016

Prevalence of mental illness and its impact on the use of home care and nursing homes: a population-based study of older adults in Manitoba. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie 52(9): 581-590, 2007

Frailty and Risk of Adverse Outcomes in Hospitalized Older Adults: A Comparison of Different Frailty Measures. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 18(7): 638.E7, 2017

Transitions in cognitive status in relation to frailty in older adults: A Comparison of three frailty measures. Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging 15(10): 863-867, 2011