+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Tough luck and tough choices: applying luck egalitarianism to oral health



Tough luck and tough choices: applying luck egalitarianism to oral health



Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 40(3): 342-362



Luck egalitarianism is often taken to task for its alleged harsh implications. For example, it may seem to imply a policy of nonassistance toward uninsured reckless drivers who suffer injuries. Luck egalitarians respond to such objections partly by pointing to a number of factors pertaining to the cases being debated, which suggests that their stance is less inattentive to the plight of the victims than it might seem at first. However, the strategy leaves some cases in which the attribution of individual responsibility is appropriate (and so, it seems, is asking people to pick up the tab for their choices). One such case is oral health or significant aspects of this. It is appropriate, the paper argues, to hold people responsible for a number of factors that affect their oral health. A luck egalitarian approach inspired by John Roemer can assess whether people have acted responsibly by comparing their choices to those of their peers. A luck egalitarian approach to oral health would recommend prioritizing scarce resources in a responsibility-weighted queuing system and include copayment and general taxation among its measures of financing.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 059144514

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 25870307

DOI: 10.1093/jmp/jhv001


Related references

Tough love or tough luck? Ceasing HAI reimbursement, CMS aims for vigilant infection control. Interview by Alan Joch. Materials Management in Health Care 16(11): 15-17, 2008

Choices Chance and Change: Luck Egalitarianism Over Time. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16(2): 393-407, 2013

A tough luck story from the grapevine. American Fruit Grower 121(5): 7*, 2001

Equality of Opportunity and Other-Affecting Choice: Why Luck Egalitarianism Does Not Require Brute Luck Equality. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16(1): 139-149, 2013

Tough choices in tough times: enhancing public health value in an era of declining resources. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 18(2): 115-125, 2012

Tough times, tough choices: the impact of the rising medical costs on the U.S. Latino electorate's health care-seeking behaviors. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved 23(4): 1383-1398, 2014

Keeping eventers sound in California: shoeing a tough horse for a tough sport in a tough environment is a tough job. American farriers' journal 12(5): 24-29, 1986

Luck Egalitarianism, Individual Responsibility and Health. Balkan Medical Journal 32(3): 244-254, 2015

A framework for luck egalitarianism in health and healthcare. Journal of Medical Ethics 41(2): 165-169, 2015

Tough choices in tough times: debt and medication nonadherence. Health Education and Behavior 41(2): 155-163, 2015

Beliefs around luck: Confirming the empirical conceptualization of beliefs around luck and the development of the Darke and Freedman beliefs around luck scale. Personality and Individual Differences 45(7): 655-660, 2008

Defending Luck Egalitarianism. Journal of Applied Philosophy 23(1): 89-107, 2006

The Coherence of Luck Egalitarianism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20(3): 617-626, 2017

Tough choices or tough times: seeing with one eye. Journal of Educational Change 9(1): 83-85, 2008

Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper.Luck Egalitarianism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20(1): 215-217, 2017