+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues



Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues



Ear and Hearing 36(3): E99-112



As cochlear implant (CI) acceptance increases and candidacy criteria are expanded, these devices are increasingly recommended for individuals with less than profound hearing loss. As a result, many individuals who receive a CI also retain acoustic hearing, often in the low frequencies, in the nonimplanted ear (i.e., bimodal hearing) and in some cases in the implanted ear (i.e., hybrid hearing) which can enhance the performance achieved by the CI alone. However, guidelines for clinical decisions pertaining to cochlear implantation are largely based on expectations for postsurgical speech-reception performance with the CI alone in auditory-only conditions. A more comprehensive prediction of postimplant performance would include the expected effects of residual acoustic hearing and visual cues on speech understanding. An evaluation of auditory-visual performance might be particularly important because of the complementary interaction between the speech information relayed by visual cues and that contained in the low-frequency auditory signal. The goal of this study was to characterize the benefit provided by residual acoustic hearing to consonant identification under auditory-alone and auditory-visual conditions for CI users. Additional information regarding the expected role of residual hearing in overall communication performance by a CI listener could potentially lead to more informed decisions regarding cochlear implantation, particularly with respect to recommendations for or against bilateral implantation for an individual who is functioning bimodally. Eleven adults 23 to 75 years old with a unilateral CI and air-conduction thresholds in the nonimplanted ear equal to or better than 80 dB HL for at least one octave frequency between 250 and 1000 Hz participated in this study. Consonant identification was measured for conditions involving combinations of electric hearing (via the CI), acoustic hearing (via the nonimplanted ear), and speechreading (visual cues). The results suggest that the benefit to CI consonant-identification performance provided by the residual acoustic hearing is even greater when visual cues are also present. An analysis of consonant confusions suggests that this is because the voicing cues provided by the residual acoustic hearing are highly complementary with the mainly place-of-articulation cues provided by the visual stimulus. These findings highlight the need for a comprehensive prediction of trimodal (acoustic, electric, and visual) postimplant speech-reception performance to inform implantation decisions. The increased influence of residual acoustic hearing under auditory-visual conditions should be taken into account when considering surgical procedures or devices that are intended to preserve acoustic hearing in the implanted ear. This is particularly relevant when evaluating the candidacy of a current bimodal CI user for a second CI (i.e., bilateral implantation). Although recent developments in CI technology and surgical techniques have increased the likelihood of preserving residual acoustic hearing, preservation cannot be guaranteed in each individual case. Therefore, the potential gain to be derived from bilateral implantation needs to be weighed against the possible loss of the benefit provided by residual acoustic hearing.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 059174416

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 25514796

DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000131


Related references

Beneficial acoustic speech cues for cochlear implant users with residual acoustic hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 131(5): 4042-4050, 2012

Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 115(4): 1729-1735, 2004

The relative phonetic contributions of a cochlear implant and residual acoustic hearing to bimodal speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 131(1): 518-530, 2012

The Effect of Residual Acoustic Hearing and Adaptation to Uncertainty on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence From Eye-Tracking. Ear and Hearing 37(1): E37, 2016

Advantages from bilateral hearing in speech perception in noise with simulated cochlear implants and residual acoustic hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133(2): 1017-1030, 2013

Speech prosody perception in cochlear implant users with and without residual hearing. Ear and Hearing 36(2): 239-248, 2016

Normal-Hearing Listeners' and Cochlear Implant Users' Perception of Pitch Cues in Emotional Speech. I-Perception6(5):0301006615599139, 2015

Effects of cooperating and conflicting cues on speech intonation recognition by cochlear implant users and normal hearing listeners. Audiology and Neuro-Otology 14(5): 327-337, 2009

Auditory/visual speech perception by cochlear implant users and hearing aid wearers. American Journal of Otology 7(5): 354-360, 1986

Auditory-visual speech perception in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123(1): 428-440, 2008

Effects of congruent and incongruent visual cues on speech perception and brain activity in cochlear implant users. Brain Structure and Function 220(2): 1109-1125, 2015

The effect of different cochlear implant microphones on acoustic hearing individuals' binaural benefits for speech perception in noise. Ear and Hearing 32(4): 468-484, 2011

Acoustic Cues for Consonant Perception with Combined Acoustic and Electric Hearing in Children. Seminars in Hearing 32(01): 032-041, 2011

A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing. Hearing Research 344: 50-61, 2017

Acoustic cues for consonant identification by patients who use the Ineraid cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 88(5): 2074-2079, 1990