+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy in the ICU: Don't Throw Away That MAC Blade Just Yet



Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy in the ICU: Don't Throw Away That MAC Blade Just Yet



Critical Care Medicine 44(11): 2106-2107




Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 059241690

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 27755070

DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000001924


Related references

First-Attempt Intubation Success of Video Laryngoscopy in Patients with Anticipated Difficult Direct Laryngoscopy: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the C-MAC D-Blade Versus the GlideScope in a Mixed Provider and Diverse Patient Population. Anesthesia and Analgesia 122(3): 740-750, 2016

Comparison of the effects of Truview PCD™ video laryngoscopy and Macintosh blade direct laryngoscopy in geriatric patients. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 35: 268-273, 2016

Comparison of Direct Laryngoscopy and Video Laryngoscopy in Intubating a Mannequin: Should Video Laryngoscopy Be Available to Manage Airway Emergencies in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Office?. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 73(10): 1901-1906, 2015

Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 27(1): 24-30, 2010

Just-in-Time Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Neonatal Intubation. Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing 30(4): 367-371, 2016

Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for first-attempt tracheal intubation in the general ward. Annals of Intensive Care 8(1): 83, 2018

Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation during in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 89: 195-199, 2015

A comparison of GlideScope video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy intubation in the emergency department. Academic Emergency Medicine 16(9): 866-871, 2009

Video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in critically ill patients: a pilot randomized trial. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 59(11): 1032-1039, 2012

Glidescope® video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 59(1): 41-52, 2012

GlideScope video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in the emergency department: a propensity score-matched analysis. Bmj Open 5(5): E007884, 2015

Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation: a retrospective analysis. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 26(5): 845-848, 2012

Comparison of success rates using video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy by residents during a simulated pediatric emergency. Simulation in Healthcare 8(3): 155-161, 2014

Comparison of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy during urgent endotracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial. Critical Care Medicine 43(3): 636-641, 2015

Comparison of intubation success of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in the difficult airway using high-fidelity simulation. Simulation in Healthcare 4(3): 160-165, 2009