EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,869,633
Abstracts:
29,686,251
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

A Markov model assessing the impact on primary care practice revenues and patient's health when using mid-level providers, lesson learned from the United Kingdom



A Markov model assessing the impact on primary care practice revenues and patient's health when using mid-level providers, lesson learned from the United Kingdom



Journal of Public Health Dentistry 77(4): 334-343



To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of using mid-level providers for dental "check-up" examinations and the treatment of caries in different NHS settings in the United Kingdom. Mid-level providers are a broad category that describes non-dentist members of dental teams. This study focused on the potential use of Dental Hygiene Therapists undertaking dental "check-up" examinations and simple restorative treatment, instead of dentists. A Markov model was used to construct the natural history of caries development in adults that visit a dental practice every six months over a five-year period. Three cost perspectives are taken: those borne to dental healthcare providers in England and Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. These represent three separate forms of retrospective payment system that are currently in use in the United Kingdom. The cost outcome was the average amount of retained practice earnings required to provide healthcare per patient visit. The health outcome was the average length of time in a cavity-free state and the cost-effectiveness outcome was incremental cost for six months in a cavity-free state. No statistical difference was found between dentists and mid-level providers in the length of time in a cavity-free state but the use of the latter saved money in all three NHS health system jurisdictions. This ranged from £7.85 (England and Wales) to £9.16 (Northern Ireland) per patient visit ($10.20 to $11.90, respectively) meaning the incremental cost for six month in a cavity-free state ranged from £261.67 ($339.93) in England and Wales to £305.33 ($369.68) in Northern Ireland. Further, changes in baseline assumptions and parameter values did not change mid-level providers being the dominant service intervention. In a time of limited funds for dental services, these results suggest that resources in public funded systems could be saved using mid-level providers in dental practices, without any health risk to patients or capital investment.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 059345603

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 28272806

DOI: 10.1111/jphd.12212



Related references

Assessing health-care providers' readiness for reporting quality and patient safety indicators at primary health-care centres in Lebanon: a national cross-sectional survey. Human Resources for Health 13(): 37-37, 2016

Identifying ways to improve the health pathway of a child with a musculoskeletal problem A comparison of practice of midlevel providers in the United States of America USA and the United Kingdom UK. International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing 17(3): 131-139, 2013

Social services in health care in The Netherlands and in the United Kingdom. II. Examples to remember. 2. The United Kingdom model. Revista de Enfermeria 19(217): 74-78, 1996

Health Care Resource Utilization for Outpatient Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes Care Delivery Among Advanced Practice Providers and Physician Providers in Primary Care. Population Health Management: -, 2017

Patient, practice and organisational influences on asthma control: observational data from a national study on primary care in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Nursing Studies 49(5): 596-609, 2012

Assessing knowledge of the patient bill of rights in central Saudi Arabia: a survey of primary health care providers and recipients. Annals of Saudi Medicine 32(2): 151-155, 2013

Explaining the amount and consistency of medical care and self-management support in asthma: a survey of primary care providers in France and the United Kingdom. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. in Practice: -, 2018

Knowledge assessment about AIDS among primary health care centers female attendees and health care providers in Abha - Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Medical Journal 20(3): 269-270, 1999

The Impact of Using Mid-level Providers in Face-to-Face Primary Care on Health Care Utilization. Medical Care 55(1): 12-18, 2016

The Impact of Using Mid-level Providers in Face-to-Face Primary Care on Health Care Utilization. Medical Care 55(1): 12-18, 2017

Multidisciplinary Rectal Cancer Care in the United States: Lessons Learned from the United Kingdom Multidisciplinary Team Model and Future Perspectives. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum: -, 2018

Cost-effectiveness of biological therapy for Crohn's disease: Markov cohort analyses incorporating United Kingdom patient-level cost data. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 30(3): 265-274, 2010

National practice guidelines for mental health care: a comparative policy analysis of the United kingdom and the United States. Journal of Health & Social Policy 19(2): 59-80, 2005

Primary immunodeficiency diseases: practice among primary care providers and awareness among the general public, United States, 2008. Genetics in Medicine 12(12): 792-800, 2011

Impact of health care adversity on providers: Lessons learned from a staff support program. Journal of Healthcare Risk Management 36(2): 27-34, 2016