+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A randomized comparison of video demonstration versus hands-on training of medical students for vacuum delivery using Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS)



A randomized comparison of video demonstration versus hands-on training of medical students for vacuum delivery using Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS)



Medicine 96(11): E6355-E6355



To compare medical students' skills for vaginal operative delivery by vacuum extraction (VE) after hands-on training versus video demonstration. We randomized medical students to an expert demonstration (group 1) or a hands-on (group 2) training using a standardized VE algorithm on a pelvic training model. Students were tested with a 40-item Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) scoring system after training and 4 days later. OSATS scores were the primary outcome. Performance time, self-assessment, confidence, and global rating scale were secondary outcomes. We assessed the constructive validity of OSATS in this VE model comparing metric scores of experts and students. In all, 137 students were randomized. OSATS scores were higher in group 2 (n = 63) compared with group 1 (n = 74) (32.89 ± 6.39 vs 27.51 ± 10.27, respectively; P < 0.0001). Global rating scale (1.49 ± 0.76 vs 2.33 ± 0.94, respectively; P < 0.0001), confidence (2.22 ± 0.75 vs 3.26 ± 0.94, respectively; P = 0.04), self-assessment (2.03 ± 0.62 vs 2.51 ± 0.77, respectively; P < 0.0001), and performance time (38.81 ± 11.58 seconds vs 47.23 ± 17.35 seconds, respectively; P = 0.001) also favored group 2. After 4 days, this effect persisted with OSATS scores still being significantly higher in group 2 (30.00 ± 6.50 vs 25.59 ± 6.09, respectively; P = 0.001). The assessed OSATS scores showed constructive validity. In a multiple linear regression analysis, group assignment independently influenced OSATS scores, whereas sex, handedness, sports activities, and type of curriculum were not independently associated with OSATS scores. Hands-on training is superior to video demonstration for teaching VE on a pelvic model.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 059394397

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 28296771

DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000006355


Related references

Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) evaluation of theoretical versus hands-on training of vaginal breech delivery management: a randomized trial. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 171(2): 252-256, 2014

A new curriculum for hysteroscopy training as demonstrated by an objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS). American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 193(5): 1856-1865, 2005

Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) evaluation of hysteroscopy training: a prospective study. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 178(): 1-5, 2015

Comparing the Effects of Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) and Traditional Method on Learning of Students. Nursing and Midwifery Studies 4(2): E27714-E27714, 2015

Objective structured assessment of technical skills evaluation of theoretical compared with hands-on training of shoulder dystocia management: a randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology 120(4): 809-814, 2012

Value and face validity of objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) for work based assessment of surgical skills in obstetrics and gynaecology. Medical Teacher 30(2): 212-216, 2008

Direct Observation versus Endoscopic Video Recording-Based Rating with the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills for Training of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. European Surgical Research. Europaische Chirurgische Forschung. Recherches Chirurgicales Europeennes 57(1-2): 1-9, 2016

Using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) global rating scale to evaluate the skills of surgical trainees in the operating room. Surgery Today 43(3): 271-275, 2013

Constructing a validity argument for the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS): a systematic review of validity evidence. Advances in Health Sciences Education 20(5): 1149-1175, 2015

Robotic objective structured assessment of technical skills: a randomized multicenter dry laboratory training pilot study. Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery 20(4): 228-236, 2015

Objective Structured Assessments of Technical Skills (OSATS) Does Not Assess the Quality of the Surgical Result Effectively. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 474(4): 874-881, 2016

Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. British Journal of Surgery 84(2): 273-278, 1997

Using standardized video cases for assessment of medical communication skills: reliability of an objective structured video examination by computer. Patient Education and Counseling 60(1): 24-31, 2006

Early, intermediate, and late effects of a surgical skills "boot camp" on an objective structured assessment of technical skills: a randomized controlled study. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 210(6): 984-989, 2010

Reliability of results produced through objectively structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) for endotracheal intubation (ETI). Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan 23(1): 51-55, 2013