A review of the use and psychometric properties of the Cognistat/Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination in adults post-cerebrovascular accident
Shea, T.; Kane, C.; Mickens, M.
Rehabilitation Psychology 62(2): 221-222
2017
ISSN/ISBN: 1939-1544 PMID: 28569535 Accession: 059399580
This Rehabilitation Measures Database summary provides a review of the psychometric properties of the Cognistat/Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination in individuals with cognitive impairment. A full review of the Cognistat/Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination as well as reviews of over 300 other instruments can be found at www.rehabmeasures.org. (PsycINFO Database Record
PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90
Related References
Doninger, N A.; Ehde, D M.; Bode, R K.; Knight, K; Bombardier, C H.; Heinemann, A W. 2006: Measurement properties of the neurobehavioral cognitive status examination (Cognistat) in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation Rehabilitation Psychology 51(4): 281-288Macaulay, C.; Battista, M.; Lebby, P.C.; Mueller, J. 2003: Geriatric performance on the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination (Cognistat). what is normal? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: the Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists 18(5): 463-471
Nabors, N A.; Millis, S R.; Rosenthal, M 1997: Use of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination (Cognistat) in Traumatic Brain Injury Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 12(3): 79-84
Ames, H; Hendrickse, W A.; Bakshi, R S.; LePage, J P.; Keefe, C 2009: Utility of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination (Cognistat) with Geriatric Mental Health Outpatients Clinical Gerontologist 32(2): 198-210
Logue, P.E.; Tupler, L.A.; D'Amico, C.; Schmitt, F.A. 1993: The neurobehavioral cognitive status examination: Psychometric properties in use with psychiatric inpatients Journal of Clinical Psychology 49(1): 80-89
Engelhart, C.; Eisenstein, N.; Johnson, V.; Wolf, J.; Williamson, J.; Steitz, D.; Girard, V.; Paramatmuni, K.; Ouzounian, N.; Losonczy, M. 1999: Factor structure of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Exam (COGNISTAT) in healthy, and psychiatrically and neurologically impaired, elderly adults Clinical Neuropsychologist 13(1): 109-111
Tsuruoka, Y.; Takahashi, M.; Suzuki, M.; Sato, K.; Shirayama, Y. 2016: Utility of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination (COGNISTAT) in differentiating between depressive states in late-life depression and late-onset Alzheimer's disease: a preliminary study Annals of General Psychiatry 15: 3
Eisenstein, N.; Engelhart, C.I.; Johnson, V.; Wolf, J.; Williamson, J.; Losonczy, M.B. 2002: Normative data for healthy elderly persons with the neurobehavioral cognitive status exam (Cognistat) Applied Neuropsychology 9(2): 110-113
Engelhart, C.; Eisenstein, N.; Meininger, J. 1994: Psychometric properties of the neurobehavioral cognitive status exam Clinical Neuropsychologist 8(4): 405-415
Drane, D.L.; Osato, S.S. 1997: Using the neurobehavioral cognitive status examination as a screening measure for older adults Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: the Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists 12(2): 139-143
Schwamm, L.H.; Van Dyke, C.; Kiernan, R.J.; Merrin, E.L.; Mueller, J. 1987: The Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination: comparison with the Cognitive Capacity Screening Examination and the Mini-Mental State Examination in a neurosurgical population Annals of Internal Medicine 107(4): 486-491
Roper, B.L.; Bieliauskas, L.A.; Perterson, M.R. 1996: Validity of the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination in cognitive screening Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology 9(1): 54-57
Rodrigues, J.d.C.; Becker, N.ál.; Beckenkamp, C.L.ís.; Miná, C.S.; de Salles, J.F.; Bandeira, D.R. 2019: Psychometric properties of cognitive screening for patients with cerebrovascular diseases a systematic review Dementia and Neuropsychologia 13(1): 31-43
Hazlewood, M. G.; Souheaver, G. T.; Cochran, W.; McClellan, J. L. 1991: Comparison of the neurobehavioral cognitive status examination and the mini-mental status examination in cases of suspected Alzheimer's patients Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 6(3): 192-192
Ware, R.; Moore, M. 2017: Validity of measures of neurological status used for predicting functional independence in adults after a cerebrovascular accident: a systematic review protocol Jbi Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports 15(3): 603-606
Murakami, H.; Fujita, K.; Futamura, A.; Sugimoto, A.; Kobayakawa, M.; Kezuka, M.; Midorikawa, A.; Kawamura, M. 2013: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination are useful for screening mild cognitive impairment in Japanese patients with Parkinson's disease Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience 1(3): 103-108
Kiernan, R.J.; Mueller, J.; Langston, J.W.; Van Dyke, C. 1987: The Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination: a brief but quantitative approach to cognitive assessment Annals of Internal Medicine 107(4): 481-485
Whiteside, D M.; Padula, M A.; Jeffrey, L K.; Zetterman, R 1996: Cognitive screening with the neurobehavioral cognitive status examination in a chronic liver disease population Clinical Neuropsychologist 10(4): 459-463
Driskell, L.D.; Lenox, S.; Galindo, J. 2018: A review of the use and psychometric properties of the Cognitive Log (Cog-Log) amongst adults with acquired brain injury Rehabilitation Psychology 63(2): 324-325
Mysiw, W.J.; Beegan, J.G.; Gatens, P.F. 1989: Prospective cognitive assessment of stroke patients before inpatient rehabilitation. the relationship of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination to functional improvement American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 68(4): 168-171