+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Assortment, but not knowledge of assortment, affects cooperation and individual success in human groups



Assortment, but not knowledge of assortment, affects cooperation and individual success in human groups



Plos One 12(10): E0185859



The success or failure of human collective action often depends on the cooperation tendencies of individuals in groups, and on the information that individuals have about each other's cooperativeness. However, it is unclear whether these two factors have an interactive effect on cooperation dynamics. Using a decision-making experiment, we confirm that groups comprising individuals with higher cooperation tendencies cooperate at a higher level than groups comprising individuals with low cooperation tendencies. Moreover, assorting individuals with similar cooperation tendency together affected behaviour so that the most cooperative individuals tended to cooperate more and the least cooperative individuals cooperated less, compared to their behaviour in randomly formed groups. In line with predictions of evolutionary models of cooperation, there was a strong positive association between individuals' cooperation tendency and success when groups were formed assortatively, whereas such association did not exist when groups were formed randomly. Surprisingly, information about group members' cooperativeness in assorted groups had no effect on cooperation levels. We discuss potential explanations for why information about cooperativeness of others may be disregarded in certain circumstances.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 059417707

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 28968451

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185859


Related references

Drafting an assortment outline plan on the basis of the statistical distribution of assortment groups. Erdeszeti es Faipari Tudomanyos Kozlemenyek 1985; (2): 163-168, 1983

Description of the Russian apple assortment according to fruit biochemical composition and problems of the assortment improvement. Sel'skokhozyaistvennaya Biologiya (3): 18-24, 2007

Multivariate models of mixed assortment: Phenotypic assortment and social homogamy for education and fluid ability. Behavior Genetics 30(6): 455-476, 2000

The assortment structure of Siberian Fir stands illustrated by assortment tables.. Lesn. Z., Arhangel'sk. 6: 1, 18-22, 1963

Calculation of assortment yield by local stand assortment tables. 1976

Nonrandom assortment of centromeres with implications regarding random assortment of the chromosomes. Experientia. 12: 177-178, 1956

Phenotypic assortment in Tetrahymena thermophila: assortment kinetics of antibiotic-resistance markers, tsA, death, and the highly amplified rDNA locus. Genetics 120(2): 389-395, 1988

Standard programmes and technology for computing volume, single-tree assortment and stand assortment tables on the 'Ural-2' electronic computer. Lesn. Hoz, 19: 8, 30-3, 1966

Phenotypic assortment in tetrahymena thermophila assortment kinetics of antibiotic resistance markers tsa death and the highly amplified ribosomal dna locus. Genetics 120(2): 389-396, 1988

Assortment estimation in robinia variety trials at Godollo and investigation of stand value increase on the basis of the size-class assortment planning method of the Hungarian Forest Research Institute. Erdeszeti Kutatasok1985 1986; 76-77: 65-81, 1984

Constructing draft single-tree assortment tables and stand assortment tables with PCs. Lesnoe Khozyaistvo ( 4): 42-43, 1998

(1) Assortment yield tables for Pine, Beech, and Oak. (2) An assortment yield table for Spruce.. Mitt. Forstwirt. Forstwiss, 10: 484-568; 569-83, 1939

Improvement of single-tree assortment tables and stand assortment tables. Lesnoe Khozaistvo (11): 41-45, 1981

Assortment of antibodies to individual proteins of the human immunodeficiency virus in sera as a factor influencing the sensitivity of serodiagnostic test systems. Immunologiya (2): 20-24, 1990

Mobility can promote the evolution of cooperation via emergent self-assortment dynamics. Plos Computational Biology 13(9): E1005732, 2017