+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A systematic survey on reporting and methods for handling missing participant data for continuous outcomes in randomized controlled trials



A systematic survey on reporting and methods for handling missing participant data for continuous outcomes in randomized controlled trials



Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 88: 57-66



To assess analytic approaches randomized controlled trial (RCT) authors use to address missing participant data (MPD) for patient-important continuous outcomes. We conducted a systematic survey of RCTs published in 2014 in the core clinical journals that reported at least one patient-important outcome analyzed as a continuous variable. Among 200 studies, 187 (93.5%) trials explicitly reported whether MPD occurred. In the 163 (81.5%) trials that reported the occurrence of MPD, the median and interquartile ranges of the percentage of participants with MPD were 11.4% (2.5%-22.6%).Among the 147 trials in which authors made clear their analytical approach to MPD, the approaches chosen included available data only (109, 67%); mixed-effect models (10, 6.1%); multiple imputation (9, 4.5%); and last observation carried forward (9, 4.5). Of the 163 studies reporting MPD, 16 (9.8%) conducted sensitivity analyses examining the impact of the MPD and (18, 11.1%) discussed the risk of bias associated with MPD. RCTs reporting continuous outcomes typically have over 10% of participant data missing. Most RCTs failed to use optimal analytic methods, and very few conducted sensitivity analyses addressing the possible impact of MPD or commented on how MPD might influence risk of bias.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 059421778

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 28583378

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.05.017


Related references

A systematic survey of the methods literature on the reporting quality and optimal methods of handling participants with missing outcome data for continuous outcomes in randomized controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 88: 67-80, 2017

A systematic review of randomised controlled trials in rheumatoid arthritis: the reporting and handling of missing data in composite outcomes. Trials 17(1): 272, 2017

Reporting, handling and assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological survey. BMJ Open 5(9): E009368, 2016

Reporting missing participant data in randomised trials: systematic survey of the methodological literature and a proposed guide. BMJ Open 5(12): E008431, 2016

Primary Outcomes Reporting in Trials (PORTal): a systematic review of inadequate reporting in pediatric randomized controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 81: 33-41, 2016

Potentially missing data is considerably more frequent than definitely missing data: A methodological survey of 638 randomized controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2018, 2018

A systematic survey shows that reporting and handling of missing outcome data in networks of interventions is poor. Bmc Medical Research Methodology 18(1): 115, 2018

184Handling missing participant data in meta-analysis of dichotomous outcomes: Proposed guidelines for systematic reviews of randomised trials. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 70(Suppl 1): A62.1-A62, 2013

Statistical analysis and handling of missing data in cluster randomized trials: a systematic review. Trials 17: 72, 2016

Quality of missing data reporting and handling in palliative care trials demonstrates that further development of the CONSORT statement is required: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 88: 81-91, 2017

A general method for handling missing binary outcome data in randomized controlled trials. Addiction 109(12): 1986-1993, 2017

A pattern-mixture model approach for handling missing continuous outcome data in longitudinal cluster randomized trials. Statistics in Medicine 36(26): 4094-4105, 2017

Multiple Imputation Methods for Handling Missing Data in Cost-effectiveness Analyses That Use Data from Hierarchical Studies An Application to Cluster Randomized Trials. 2013

Multiple imputation methods for handling missing data in cost-effectiveness analyses that use data from hierarchical studies: an application to cluster randomized trials. Medical Decision Making 33(8): 1051-1063, 2014

Reporting of outcomes in randomized controlled trials on nail psoriasis: a systematic review. British Journal of Dermatology 178(3): E235-E235, 2018