+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Biofilm formation capability of enterococcal strains causing urinary tract infection vis-a-vis colonisation and correlation with enterococcal surface protein gene



Biofilm formation capability of enterococcal strains causing urinary tract infection vis-a-vis colonisation and correlation with enterococcal surface protein gene



Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology 35(1): 48-52



Data regarding differences in biofilm formation among urinary isolates of enterococci causing nosocomial infection versus asymptomatic colonisation is lacking. Conflicting data are available for the role of enterococcal surface protein (esp) gene in the development of enterococcal biofilms. A total of 50 (25 each of asymptomatic bacteriuria and urinary tract infection (UTI) isolates were collected from admitted patients who had nosocomial acquisition of enterococci in urine culture (≥105 cfu/ml). Biofilm assay was done by the quantitative adherence assay. Screening for esp gene was carried out by polymerase chain reaction, and confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to examine biofilms. Out of 25 enterococcal isolates from asymptomatic patients, 9 (36%) isolates were found to be biofilm producers (6 weak [optical densities [OD]595 0.2] and three medium [OD595≥0.2 to595>0.5]). The esp gene was present in 30 (12 biofilm+, 18 biofilm-) isolates. Seventeen esp positive isolates were from asymptomatic cases whereas 13 were from UTI. However, we found that 100% of medium and strong biofilm producers were esp positive (P < 0.001). On comparing Enterococcus faecalis (n = 10) and E. faecium (n = 40) isolates, 70% of E. faecalis isolates were biofilm producers as compared to only 35% of E. faecium isolates (P > 0.05). The esp positivity was observed more in E. faecium isolates (65%) as compared to 40% in E. faecalis. Vancomycin-sensitive enterococcal and vancomycin-resistant enterococcal isolates and catheter-related and unrelated isolates showed similarity in biofilm production and esp positivity. The esp gene is not compulsorily required to produce biofilm but when present may enhance the biofilm formation. We did not find any correlation between biofilm formation and the ability of the strain to cause symptomatic UTI be associated with catheters or vancomycin resistance.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 059445785

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 28303818


Related references

Insertional inactivation of the enterococcal surface protein gene, esp, reduces Biofilm formation of Enterococcus faecium. 2007

Enterococcal surface protein transiently aggravates Enterococcus faecium-induced urinary tract infection in mice. Journal of Infectious Diseases 200(7): 1162-1165, 2009

Enterococcal biofilm formation and virulence in an optimized murine model of foreign body-associated urinary tract infections. Infection and Immunity 78(10): 4166-4175, 2010

Correlation between enterococcal biofilm formation in vitro and medical-device-related infection potential in vivo. Journal of Medical Microbiology 52(Pt 7): 547-550, 2003

The enterococcal surface protein, Esp, is involved in Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 67(10): 4538-4545, 2001

Enterococcal surface protein, Esp, enhances biofilm formation by Enterococcus faecalis. Infection and Immunity 72(10): 6032-6039, 2004

Enterococcal surface protein Esp is important for biofilm formation of Enterococcus faecium E1162. Journal of Bacteriology 189(22): 8233-8240, 2007

vanA Gene Harboring Enterococcal and Non-enterococcal Isolates Expressing High Level Vancomycin and Teicoplanin Resistance Reservoired in Surface Waters. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 98(5): 712-719, 2016

Association between the presence of enterococcal virulence factors gelatinase, hemolysin, and enterococcal surface protein and mortality among patients with bacteremia due to Enterococcus faecalis. Clinical Infectious Diseases 35(5): 570-575, 2002

Spread of Enterococcal Surface Protein in Antibiotic Resistant Entero-coccus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis isolates from Urinary Tract Infections. Open Microbiology Journal 9: 14-17, 2015

Increased conjugation frequencies in clinical Enterococcus faecium strains harbouring the enterococcal surface protein gene esp. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 12(6): 588-591, 2006

Relationship between biofilm formation, the enterococcal surface protein (Esp) and gelatinase in clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium. Fems Microbiology Letters 256(1): 145-150, 2006

Enterococcal infection of the kidneys and urinary tract. Urologiia i Nefrologiia 1980(1): 65-70, 1980

Carbomycin in the treatment of enterococcal urinary tract infection. Antibiotics and ChemoTherapy 4(1): 43-47, 2014

The epidemiology of nosocomial enterococcal urinary tract infection. American Journal of the Medical Sciences 272(1): 75-81, 1976