+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Byte by Bite: Use of a mobile Bite Counter and weekly behavioral challenges to promote weight loss



Byte by Bite: Use of a mobile Bite Counter and weekly behavioral challenges to promote weight loss



Smart Health 3-4: 20-26



The goal of this study was to examine the usability and feasibility of the mobile Bite Counter (a watch-like device that detects when a user consumes food or beverage) and the impact of weekly behavioral challenges on diet and physical activity outcomes. Overweight (mean BMI 31.1±4.9 kg/m2) adults (n=12) were recruited to participate in a four-week study to test both the usability and feasibility of using the device as part of a behavioral weight loss intervention. Participants were instructed to self-monitor number of bites/day using the Bite Counter, attend weekly group sessions, and listen to weekly podcasts. Participants were given weekly challenges: use a daily bite limit goal (wk1), turn off Bite Counter when fruits/vegetables are consumed (wk2), self-monitor kilocalories vs. bites (wk3), and receive a 10 bites/day bonus for every 30 minutes of exercise (wk4). Participants lost a mean of -1.2±1.3 kg. Only the wk3 challenge produced significant differences in kcal change (wk3 1302±120 kcal/day vs. baseline 2042±302 kcal/d, P<0.05). Bite Counter use was significantly correlated with weight loss (r= -0.58, P<0.05). Future studies should examine the use of the Bite Counter and impact of behavioral challenges over a longer period of time in a controlled study.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 059462081

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 29104905

DOI: 10.1016/j.smhl.2017.03.004


Related references

Behavioral indicators of loss of control over eating: bite size and bite velocity. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie 60(4): 270-284, 2011

Short-term ingestive behaviour of sheep and goats grazing grasses and legumes: 1. Comparison of bite weight, bite rate, and bite dimensions for forages at two stages of maturity. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 39(1): 63-73, 1996

Slowing bite-rate reduces energy intake: an application of the bite counter device. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 111(8): 1231-1235, 2011

Geographic variation in access to dog-bite care in Pakistan and risk of dog-bite exposure in Karachi: prospective surveillance using a low-cost mobile phone system. Plos Neglected Tropical Diseases 7(12): E2574, 2013

Sward canopy structure and the bite dimensions and bite weight of grazing sheep. Grass & Forage Science 46(1): 29-38, 1991

The influence of sward structure on peak bite force and bite weight in sheep. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 51: 153-158, 1991

A bite is a bite is a bite? constraints on response to folivory in piper arietinum piperaceae. Ecology (Washington D C) 73(1): 143-152, 1992

A bite is a bite is a bite? Constraints on response to folivory in Piper arieianum (Piperaceae). Ecology 73(1): 143-152, 1992

Reproducibility in bite-wing radiographs. A comparison of Eggen-Bite and Kwik-Bite. Den Norske Tannlaegeforenings Tidende 97(2): 41-44, 1987

The individualisation of a dog bite mark: a case study highlighting the bite mark analysis, with emphasis on differences between dog and human bite marks. International Journal of Legal Medicine 126(3): 441-446, 2012

A Different Weight Loss Experience: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Behavioral, Physical, and Psychosocial Changes Associated with Yoga That Promote Weight Loss. Evidence-BasedComplementaryandAlternativeMedicine2016:2914745, 2016

A contextual approach to managing snake bite in Pakistan: snake bite treatment with particular reference to neurotoxieity and the ideal hospital snake bite kit. Jpma. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association 58(6): 325-331, 2008

Bite mark evidence: bite mark analysis is not the same as bite mark comparison or matching or identification. Journal of Law and the Biosciences 4(3): 617-622, 2017

A study of patients with Angle Class I unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) using lateral roentgenographic cephalograms. A comparison between anterior cross-bite UCLP patients and anterior cross-bite non-UCLP, normal bite UCLP or normal bite non-UCLP patients. Journal of Nihon University School of Dentistry 38(2): 67-77, 1996

Effectiveness of a fixed anterior bite plane in Class II deep-bite patients. International Journal of Orthodontics 25(1): 15-20, 2014