+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comparative evaluation of Ambu AuraGain™ with ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy



Comparative evaluation of Ambu AuraGain™ with ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy



Indian Journal of Anaesthesia 61(6): 469-474



Second generation supraglottic airways are increasingly being used in surgical patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Preventing aspiration at higher airway pressures may be at the expense of a higher cuff pressure which can impair mucosal perfusion. We attempted to elucidate whether Ambu AuraGain™ (AAU) would provide a higher oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) with a lower mucosal pressure in comparison to ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway (PLMA). This was a prospective randomised study involving sixty patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia, using either AAU (Group AAU [n = 30]) or PLMA (Group PLMA [n = 30]) for elective ventilation. Primary outcome measure was the OLP. Number of insertion attempts, ease of insertion, time required for placement and calculated pharyngeal mucosal pressure were the secondary outcome measures. Data were analysed using Student's t-test and Chi-square test. No significant difference in the OLP was noted in both groups. The ease of insertion and success rate at first attempt was similar between the groups. Time taken for insertion in Group AAU was longer than Group PLMA (13.57 ± 1.94 vs. 11.60 ± 2.22 s). The calculated pharyngeal mucosal pressures were lower with Group AAU than Group PLMA for all 3 sizes. The minimum cuff pressure and minimum cuff volume required to prevent leak were found similar in both groups. AAU provides adequate sealing pressures and effective ventilation with lower calculated pharyngeal mucosal pressure, compared to PLMA.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 059524431

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 28655951


Related references

A comparative evaluation of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway, I-gel and Supreme laryngeal mask airway in adult patients undergoing elective surgery: A randomised trial. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia 62(11): 858-864, 2018

Comparison of the Supreme and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiologica Taiwanica 54(2): 44-50, 2016

A comparative study of the Cobra perilaryngeal airway and Proseal laryngeal mask airway during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 56(2): 151-155, 2009

Endotracheal intubation through laryngeal Ambu® Auragain™ mask airway mask in paediatric patients affected by congenital infiltrating lipomatosis. Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia Y Reanimacion 66(4): 222-225, 2019

Comparative Study of Two Laryngeal Mask Airways: Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway and Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway in Anesthetized Paralyzed Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery. Anesthesia Essays and Researches 11(1): 23-27, 2017

Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme and Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal with respect to oropharyngeal leak pressure during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 30(3): 119-123, 2013

Fiberoptic intubation of severely obese patients through supraglottic airway: A prospective, randomized trial of the Ambu ® AuraGain™ laryngeal mask vs the i-gel™ airway. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 63(2): 187-194, 2019

The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and the laryngeal tube Suction for ventilation in gynaecological patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 22(2): 117-122, 2005

The usage of Ambu® AuraGain™ laryngeal mask airway by the lifeguards. American Journal of Emergency Medicine 36(12): 2331-2332, 2018

Esophageal Doppler monitoring with the Ambu® AuraGain™ laryngeal mask airway. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 38: 91-92, 2017

Ambu® AuraGain™ laryngeal mask as a method of airway management of patient entrapped in vehicle. American Journal of Emergency Medicine 37(1): 171-172, 2019

The comparison of Proseal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries under general anaesthesia. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia 55(2): 129-134, 2011

A prospective, randomized, Single-blinded, comparative study of Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway and ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway in pediatric patients. Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 28(3): 318-321, 2012

A response to 'Airway rescue in acute upper airway obstruction using a ProSeal Laryngeal mask airway and an Aintree Catheter: a review of the ProSeal Laryngeal mask airway in the management of the difficult airway'. Anaesthesia 61(6): 618-619, 2006

The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia 64(1): 79-83, 2009