+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Diagnosing environmental allergies: Comparison of skin-prick, intradermal, and serum specific immunoglobulin E testing



Diagnosing environmental allergies: Comparison of skin-prick, intradermal, and serum specific immunoglobulin E testing



Allergy and Rhinology 8(2): 53-62



Allergists commonly perform intradermal skin testing (IDST) after negative skin-prick testing (SPT) to comprehensively diagnose environmental allergic sensitization. However, with the availability of modern methods to detect serum-specific immunoglobulin E (ssIgE), it is unclear if ssIgE testing could substitute for IDST. To determine the efficacy of ssIgE testing and IDST when added to SPT in diagnosing environmental allergic sensitizations. SPT, IDST, and ssIgE testing to nine common environmental allergens were analyzed in 75 patients with oculonasal symptoms who presented to our allergy clinics in the Bronx, New York, between January 2014 and May 2015. A total of 651 SPT and 499 ssIgE tests were independently performed and revealed 162 (25%) and 127 (25%) sensitizations, respectively. When SPT results were negative, IDST results revealed 108 of 452 additional sensitizations (24%). In contrast, when SPT results were negative, ssIgE test results only revealed 9% additional sensitizations. When both SPT and IDST results were negative, ssIgE testing only detected 3% of additional sensitizations, and ssIgE levels were typically low in these cases (median, 1.25 kU/L; range, 0.357-4.47 kU/L). When both SPT and ssIgE test results were negative, IDST results detected 15% additional sensitizations. IDST detected more additional environmental sensitizations compared with ssIgE testing. IDST, therefore, may be useful when the SPT and/or ssIgE testing results were negative, but the exposure history indicated relevant allergic sensitization. Serology added only a little more information if both SPT and IDST results were negative but may be useful in combination with SPT if IDST cannot be performed.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 059602397

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 28583228

DOI: 10.2500/ar.2017.8.0194


Related references

A comparison of intradermal testing and detection of allergen-specific immunoglobulin E in serum by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in horses affected with skin hypersensitivity. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 120(3-4): 160-167, 2007

The correlation between intradermal testing and serum specific IgE to house dust mite in negative skin prick test allergic rhinitis adult patients. Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology 33(4): 308-311, 2015

Is electrodermal testing as effective as skin prick tests for diagnosing allergies? A double blind, randomised block design study. BMJ 322(7279): 131-134, 2001

Comparison of intradermal dilutional testing, skin prick testing, and modified quantitative testing for common allergens. Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery 137(2): 246-249, 2007

Comparison between serial skin-prick tests and specific serum immunoglobulin E to mite allergens. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology 10(2): 138-142, 1999

Comparison of Multi-Test II skin prick testing to intradermal dilutional testing. Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery 130(5): 536-544, 2004

Skin prick vs intradermal skin testing in children Are skin prick tests alone sufficient?. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology 105(1 part 2): S232-S233, 2000

Comparison of skin prick tests with specific serum immunoglobulin E in the diagnosis of fungal sensitization in patients with severe asthma. Clinical and Experimental Allergy 39(11): 1677-1683, 2009

Allergy testing using iontophoretic application of allergens into the skin as compared to prick skin testing intradermal skin testing and rast testing. Annals of Allergy 64(1): 95, 1990

Diagnosing peanut allergy with skin prick and specific IgE testing. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 115(6): 1291-1296, 2005

Basophil responsiveness in patients with insect sting allergies and negative venom-specific immunoglobulin E and skin prick test results. Clinical and Experimental Allergy 39(11): 1730-1737, 2009

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of pollen allergen extracts using skin prick testing and serum specific IgE as references. Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology 35(4): 191-195, 2017

Diagnosing inhalant allergies: intradermal or in vitro testing?. Veterinary medicine 83(8): 779-781, 1988

Comparison of intradermal skin testing (IDST) and serum allergen-specific IgE determination in an experimental model of feline asthma. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 132(1): 46-52, 2009

A comparison of skin prick tests, intradermal skin tests, and specific IgE in the diagnosis of mouse allergy. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 121(4): 933-939, 2008