+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Diagnostic accuracy of a hybrid approach of instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve using high-dose intracoronary adenosine to characterize intermediate coronary lesions: Results of the PALS (Practical Assessment of Lesion Severity) prospective study



Diagnostic accuracy of a hybrid approach of instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve using high-dose intracoronary adenosine to characterize intermediate coronary lesions: Results of the PALS (Practical Assessment of Lesion Severity) prospective study



Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 90(7): 1070-1076



We sought to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and high-dose intracoronary adenosine fractional flow reserve (IC-FFR) compared with classical intravenous adenosine fractional flow reserve (IV-FFR) to assess coronary stenosis severity. The usefulness of two hybrid strategies combining iFR and high-dose IC-FFR was also evaluated. Physiological assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses to guide revascularization is currently recommended. Consecutive real-world patients with angiographically intermediate coronary stenosis (40-80% diameter stenosis) were prospectively included in the PALS (Practical Assessment of Lesion Severity) study. In every target lesion iFR, high-dose IC-FFR and IV-FFR were systematically measured to assess the accuracy of an hybrid sequential approach combining iFR and IC-FFR. A total of 106 patients with 121 intermediate coronary lesions were analyzed. Both, iFR and IC-FFR showed a significant correlation with IV-FFR (iFR: r = 0.60, 95%CI 0.48-0.70; IC-FFR: r = 0.88; 95%CI: 0.83-0.92). High-dose IC-FFR provided lower FFR values than IV-FFR (0.81 ± 0.08 vs. 0.82 ± 0.09, P = 0.25). Using a receiver-operating-characteristic curve an optimal iFR threshold of 0.91 for the screening test was identified. A sequential test strategy (initial iFR followed by IC-FFR only in lesions with iFR <0.91) yielded an excellent diagnostic accuracy (96.7%, 95%CI 96.7-99.1%) with a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predicted values of 100%, 94.7%, 91.8%, and 100%, respectively. A hybrid approach using the previously described iFR gray zone (0.85-0.94) also provided an excellent diagnostic accuracy (95%, 95%CI: 89.5-98.1%). In patients with intermediate coronary lesions a hybrid strategy by using a sequential approach of iFR and high-dose IC-FFR, provided a very good diagnostic performance to identify physiologically significant stenoses. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 059603842

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 28544741

DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27038


Related references

Study of diagnostic efficiencies of pressure indices (rest pd/pa, instantaneous wave free ratio, contrast fractional flow reserve) against fractional flow reserve 0.80 in intermediate coronary lesions. Indian Heart Journal 70: S71-S72, 2018

Assessment of left anterior descending artery stenosis of intermediate severity by fractional flow reserve, instantaneous wave-free ratio and non-invasive coronary flow reserve. Annales de Cardiologie et d'Angéiologie 65(5): 380-381, 2016

Assessment of left anterior descending artery stenosis of intermediate severity by fractional flow reserve, instantaneous wave-free ratio, and non-invasive coronary flow reserve. International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 33(7): 999-1007, 2016

TCT-714 Comparison of Outcomes between Single Cutoff Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio versus Hybrid Protocol using Fractional Flow Reserve on Intermediate Coronary Lesions: Results from a Single-center Registry. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 70(18): B305-B306, 2017

Instantaneous wave-free ratio as an alternative to fractional flow reserve in assessment of moderate coronary stenoses: A meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine 19(5 Pt B): 613-620, 2018

Baseline instantaneous wave-free ratio as a pressure-only estimation of underlying coronary flow reserve: results of the JUSTIFY-CFR Study (Joined Coronary Pressure and Flow Analysis to Determine Diagnostic Characteristics of Basal and Hyperemic Indices of Functional Lesion Severity-Coronary Flow Reserve). Circulation. Cardiovascular Interventions 7(4): 492-502, 2015

Diagnostic classification of the instantaneous wave-free ratio is equivalent to fractional flow reserve and is not improved with adenosine administration. Results of CLARIFY (Classification Accuracy of Pressure-Only Ratios Against Indices Using Flow Study). Journal of the American College of Cardiology 61(13): 1409-1420, 2013

Fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio for the physiological assessment of coronary artery stenosis in the catheterization laboratory: Practical tips. Annales de Cardiologie et d'Angeiologie 66(1): 32-41, 2016

Classification performance of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve in a clinical population of intermediate coronary stenoses: results of the ADVISE registry. Eurointervention 9(1): 91-101, 2013

Diagnostic performance of instantaneous wave-free ratio for the evaluation of coronary stenosis severity confirmed by fractional flow reserve: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of randomized studies. Medicine 95(36): E4774, 2017

VERIFY (VERification of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis Severity in EverydaY Practice): a multicenter study in consecutive patients. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 61(13): 1421-1427, 2013

Prospective Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio to Assess Coronary Stenosis Relevance: Results of ADVISE II International, Multicenter Study (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation II). Jacc. Cardiovascular Interventions 8(6): 824-833, 2016

Fractional Flow Reserve/Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Discordance in Angiographically Intermediate Coronary Stenoses: An Analysis Using Doppler-Derived Coronary Flow Measurements. Jacc. Cardiovascular Interventions 10(24): 2514-2524, 2017

TCT-163 Physiologic Assessment of Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis by Intravascular Ultrasound Radiofrequency Signal Analysis of Blood Speckles: A Comparison with Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 66(15): B59-B60, 2015

A Comparison between the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio and Resting Distal Coronary Artery Pressure/Aortic Pressure and the Fractional Flow Reserve: The Diagnostic Accuracy Can Be Improved by the Use of both Indices. Internal Medicine 56(7): 749-753, 2017