+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Does Surveillance Bias Influence the Validity of Measures of Inpatient Complications? A Systematic Review



Does Surveillance Bias Influence the Validity of Measures of Inpatient Complications? A Systematic Review



American Journal of Medical Quality 33(3): 291-302



Surveillance bias may threaten the accuracy of inpatient complication measures. A systematic literature review was conducted to examine whether surveillance bias influences the validity of selected Patient Safety Indicator- and health care associated infection-related measures. Ten venous thromboembolism (VTE) articles were identified: 7 trauma related, 3 postoperative, and 1 central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) article. Nine VTE articles found positive associations between deep vein thrombosis imaging and VTE diagnoses. Because imaging also may be symptom driven, most studies performed additional analyses to corroborate findings. Six trauma-related and 2 postoperative VTE studies concluded that surveillance bias was present, the latter based on circumstantial evidence. The non-VTE study found a significant positive correlation between surveillance aggressiveness and intensive care unit CLABSI rates. Even considering VTE, relatively little is known about the impact of surveillance bias on inpatient complication measures. Given the implications of misclassifying hospitals on quality, this issue requires further investigation using more direct measurement methods.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 059625813

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 28958153

DOI: 10.1177/1062860617730900


Related references

Indoor Air Quality in Inpatient Environments: A Systematic Review on Factors that Influence Chemical Pollution in Inpatient Wards. Journal of Healthcare Engineering 2019: 8358306, 2019

What Adherence Measures Should Be Used in Trials of Home-Based Rehabilitation Interventions? A Systematic Review of the Validity, Reliability, and Acceptability of Measures. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 98(6): 1241-1256.E45, 2016

Validity of electronic surveillance systems: a systematic review. Journal of Hospital Infection 69(3): 220-229, 2008

Validity, Reliability and Feasibility of Tools to Identify Frail Older Patients in Inpatient Hospital Care: A Systematic Review. Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging 20(2): 218-230, 2016

A systematic review of the responsiveness of lower limb physical performance measures in inpatient care after stroke. Bmc Neurology 13: 4, 2013

Validity of Cognitive Load Measures in Simulation-Based Training: A Systematic Review. Academic Medicine 90(11 Suppl): S24-S35, 2016

A systematic review of the validity and reliability of sedentary behaviour measures used with children and adolescents. Obesity Reviews 12(10): 781-799, 2012

Do hospitalist physicians improve the quality of inpatient care delivery? A systematic review of process, efficiency and outcome measures. Bmc Medicine 9: 58, 2011

A literature review to assess the reliability and validity of measures appropriate for use in research to evaluate the efficacy of a brief harm reduction strategy in reducing cannabis use among people with schizophrenia in acute inpatient settings. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 15(9): 777-783, 2008

Does the prevention of complications explain the survival benefit of organized inpatient (stroke unit) care?: further analysis of a systematic review. Stroke 38(9): 2536-2540, 2007

Empirical Evidence for the Validity and Reliability of Resource-Use Measures Based on Patient Recall: A Systematic Review. Value in Health 16(7): A579-A580, 2013

Available and proposed foot measures in terms of reliability, validity and applicability on an adult population: a systematic review. Footwear Science 9(Sup1): S59-S60, 2017

Reliability and Validity of Subjective Measures of Aerobic Intensity in Adults With Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review. Pm and R 10(2): 194-207, 2017

A Systematic Review and Appraisal of the Cross-Cultural Validity of Functional Status Assessments Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Care and Research 2019, 2019

A systematic review of publications assessing reliability and validity of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 2004-2011. Bmc Medical Research Methodology 13: 49, 2013