+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations



Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations



Journal of Animal Science 95(4): 1434-1443



Currently used multi-step methods to incorporate genomic information in the prediction of breeding values (BV) implicitly involve many assumptions which, if violated, may result in loss of information, inaccuracies and bias. To overcome this, single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) was proposed combining pedigree, phenotype and genotype of all individuals for genetic evaluation. Our objective was to implement ssGBLUP for genomic predictions in pigs and to compare the accuracy of ssGBLUP with that of multi-step methods with empirical data of moderately sized pig breeding populations. Different predictions were performed: conventional parent average (PA), direct genomic value (DGV) calculated with genomic BLUP (GBLUP), a GEBV obtained by blending the DGV with PA, and ssGBLUP. Data comprised individuals from a German Landrace (LR) and Large White (LW) population. The trait 'number of piglets born alive' (NBA) was available for 182,054 litters of 41,090 LR sows and 15,750 litters from 4534 LW sows. The pedigree contained 174,021 animals, of which 147,461 (26,560) animals were LR (LW) animals. In total, 526 LR and 455 LW animals were genotyped with the Illumina PorcineSNP60 BeadChip. After quality control and imputation, 495 LR (424 LW) animals with 44,368 (43,678) SNP on 18 autosomes remained for the analysis. Predictive abilities, i.e., correlations between de-regressed proofs and genomic BV, were calculated with a five-fold cross validation and with a forward prediction for young genotyped validation animals born after 2011. Generally, predictive abilities for LR were rather small (0.08 for GBLUP, 0.19 for GEBV and 0.18 for ssGBLUP). For LW, ssGBLUP had the greatest predictive ability (0.45). For both breeds, assessment of reliabilities for young genotyped animals indicated that genomic prediction outperforms PA with ssGBLUP providing greater reliabilities (0.40 for LR and 0.32 for LW) than GEBV (0.35 for LR and 0.29 for LW). Grouping of animals according to information sources revealed that genomic prediction had the highest potential benefit for genotyped animals without their own phenotype. Although, ssGBLUP did not generally outperform GBLUP or GEBV, the results suggest that ssGBLUP can be a useful and conceptually convincing approach for practical genomic prediction of NBA in moderately sized LR and LW populations.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 059677642

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 28464085

DOI: 10.2527/jas.2016.0991


Related references

A genome-wide association study in large white and landrace pig populations for number piglets born alive. Plos one 10(3): E0117468, 2015

Optimization of breeding value estimation for piglets born alive in view of litter number differentiation and herd season. Zuchtungskunde 82(3): 205-216, 2010

Effects of inbreeding on number of piglets born total, born alive and weaned in Austrian Large White and Landrace pigs. Archiv Fur Tierzucht-Archives of Animal Breeding 52(1): 51-64, 2009

Effect of breeding according to the indices of increase in growth rate and decrease in fat thickness on the number of born alive english large white and english landrace piglets. Zhivotnov"dni Nauki 28(5-8): 147-151, 1991

Variation in the number of piglets born alive according to age and selection of mothers. 1972

Genetic parameters for number of piglets born alive using a random regression model. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus Poljoprivredna Znanstvena Smotra 68(2): 105-108, 2003

Analysis of the association of number of piglets born alive with sow level and management factors. Journal of Dairy Science 93: 775-776, 2010

Analysis of the association of number of piglets born alive with sow level factors and season of farrowing. Journal of Animal Science 84: 70-71, 2006

Estimation of candidate gene effects on number of piglets born alive for German Landrace sows and boars. Zuchtungskunde 74(4): 276-287, 2002

Estimation of candidate gene effects on number of piglets born alive and weaned in German Landrace boars used for artificial insemination. Zuchtungskunde 75(3): 204-213, 2003

Estimated breeding values for number born alive in pigs - do they really work?. Manipulating pig production X Proceedings of the Tenth Biennial Conference of the Australasian Pig Science Association APSA, held in Christchurch, New Zealand, 27th to 30th November, 2005: 102, 2005

Genetic improvement of litter size in pigs selected for total number born or number born alive. Japanese Journal of Swine Science 43(1): 16-19, 2006

Prediction of number born alive and weaning weight of litter in first parity using performance test traits in four breeds of swine. Poultry Science 86: 479-479, 2007

Determination of beta-defensin genomic copy number in different populations: a comparison of three methods. Plos one 6(2): E16768, 2011

Genome-wide association study of total number born and number born alive in pigs using both compressed mixed linear model and Bayes model. Yi Chuan 34(10): 1261-1270, 2012