+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Evaluation of feasibility of 1.5 Tesla prostate MRI using body coil RF transmit in a patient with an implanted vagus nerve stimulator

Evaluation of feasibility of 1.5 Tesla prostate MRI using body coil RF transmit in a patient with an implanted vagus nerve stimulator

Medical Physics 44(11): 5749-5754

To assess risks of RF-heating of a vagus nerve stimulator (VNS) during 1.5 T prostate MRI using body coil transmit and to compare these risks with those associated with MRI head exams using a transmit/receive head coil. Spatial distributions of radio-frequency (RF) B1 fields generated by transmit/receive (T/R) body and head coils were empirically assessed along the long axis of a 1.5 T MRI scanner bore. Measurements were obtained along the center axis of the scanner and laterally offset by 15 cm (body coil) and 7 cm (head coil). RF-field measurements were supplemented with direct measurements of RF-heating of 15 cm long copper wires affixed to and submerged in the "neck" region of the gelled saline-filled (sodium chloride and polyacrylic acid) "head-and-torso" phantom. Temperature elevations at the lead tips were measured using fiber-optic thermometers with the phantom positioned at systematically increased distances from the scanner isocenter. B1 field measurements demonstrated greater than 10 dB reduction in RF power at distances beyond 28 cm and 24 cm from isocenter for body and head coil, respectively. Moreover, RF power from body coil transmit at distances greater than 32 cm from isocenter was found to be lower than from the RF power from head coil transmit measured at locations adjacent to the coil array at its opening. Correspondingly, maximum temperature elevations at the tips of the copper wires decreased with increasing distance from isocenter - from 7.4°C at 0 cm to no appreciable heating at locations beyond 40 cm. For the particular scanner model evaluated in this study, positioning an implanted VNS farther than 32 cm from isocenter (configuration achievable for prostate exams) can reduce risks of RF-heating resulting from the body coil transmit to those associated with using a T/R head coil.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 059705521

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 28880381

DOI: 10.1002/mp.12567

Related references

3 Tesla MRI of patients with a vagus nerve stimulator: initial experience using a T/R head coil under controlled conditions. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 31(2): 475-481, 2010

T2-weighted prostate MRI at 7 Tesla using a simplified external transmit-receive coil array: correlation with radical prostatectomy findings in two prostate cancer patients. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 41(1): 226-232, 2015

Unshielded asymmetric transmit-only and endorectal receive-only radiofrequency coil for (23) Na MRI of the prostate at 3 tesla. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 42(2): 436-445, 2015

Breast cancer at site of implanted vagus nerve stimulator. Neurology 68(9): 703, 2007

MRI of the brain is safe in patients implanted with the vagus nerve stimulator. Seizure 10(7): 512-515, 2001

Radiofrequency energy ablation in a child with an implanted vagus nerve stimulator. Cardiology in the Young 25(7): 1379-1381, 2015

Relationship of vocal cord paralysis to the coil diameter of vagus nerve stimulator leads. Journal of Neurosurgery 122(3): 532-535, 2015

Retrospective analysis of the effect of a vagus nerve stimulator implanted in paediatric patients with refractory epilepsy. Revista de Neurologia 63(1): 11-18, 2016

Mismatch negativity analysis in drug-resistant epileptic patients implanted with vagus nerve stimulator. Brain Research Bulletin 73(1-3): 81-85, 2007

Pulsed magnetization transfer imaging with body coil transmission at 3 Tesla: feasibility and application. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 56(4): 866-875, 2006

MR imaging of the prostate at 3 Tesla: comparison of an external phased-array coil to imaging with an endorectal coil at 1.5 Tesla. Academic Radiology 11(8): 857-862, 2004

Cervical spinal MRI in a patient with a vagus nerve stimulator (VNS). Epilepsy Research 84(2-3): 273-275, 2009

New onset syncopal events following vagus nerve stimulator implantation might be key to preventing vagus nerve stimulation-induced symptomatic bradycardia - A case report and review. Epilepsy and Behavior Case Reports 10: 57-60, 2018

Vagus nerve stimulation for intractable epilepsy: implantation of vagus nerve stimulator. No Shinkei Geka. Neurological Surgery 36(11): 979-989, 2008

Dynamic multi-coil tailored excitation for transmit B1 correction at 7 Tesla. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 76(1): 83-93, 2016