+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Fractional fetal thigh volume in the prediction of normal and abnormal fetal growth during the third trimester of pregnancy

Fractional fetal thigh volume in the prediction of normal and abnormal fetal growth during the third trimester of pregnancy

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 217(4): 453.E1-453.E12

Currently, 2-dimensional ultrasound estimation of fetal size rather than fetal growth is used to define fetal growth restriction, but single estimates in late pregnancy lack sensitivity and may identify small for gestational age rather than growth restriction. Single or longitudinal measures of 3-dimensional fractional thigh volume may address this problem. We sought to derive normal values for 3-dimensional fractional thigh volume in the third trimester, determine if fractional thigh volume is superior to 2-dimensional ultrasound biometry alone for detecting fetal growth restriction, and determine whether individualized growth assessment parameters have the potential to identify fetal growth restriction remote from term delivery. This was a longitudinal prospective cohort study of 115 unselected pregnancies in a tertiary referral unit (St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom). Standard 2-dimensional ultrasound biometry measurements were obtained, along with fractional thigh volume measurements (based on 50% of the femoral diaphysis length). Measurements were used to calculate estimated fetal weight (Hadlock). Individualized growth assessment parameters and percentage deviations in longitudinally measured biometrics were determined using a Web-based system (iGAP; http://iGAP. bcm.edu). Small for gestational age was defined <10th and fetal growth restriction <3rd customized birthweight centile. Logistic regression was used to compare estimated fetal weight (Hadlock), estimated fetal weight (biparietal diameter-abdominal circumference-fractional thigh volume), fractional thigh volume, and abdominal circumference for the prediction of small for gestational age or fetal growth restriction at birth. Screening performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. There was a better correlation between fractional thigh volume and estimated fetal weight ((biparietal diameter-abdominal circumference-fractional thigh volume) obtained at 34-36 weeks with birthweight than between 2-dimensional biometry measures such as abdominal circumference and estimated fetal weight (Hadlock). There was also a modest improvement in the detection of both small for gestational age and fetal growth restriction using fractional thigh volume-derived measures compared to standard 2-dimensional measurements (area under receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.94, and area under receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-0.99, respectively). Fractional thigh volume measurements offer some improvement over 2-dimensional biometry for the detection of late-onset fetal growth restriction at 34-36 weeks.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 059750695

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 28651860

DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.06.018

Related references

OP29.04: Second trimester three-dimensional fetal fractional thigh volume as a predictor of fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 44(S1): 172-173, 2014

Comparison of fetal thigh fractional limb volume with neonatal ponderal index in fetal growth restriction. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 220(1): S669-S670, 2019

Individualized growth assessment of fetal soft tissue using fractional thigh volume. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 24(7): 766-774, 2004

Two-dimensional fetal biometry versus three-dimensional fractional thigh volume for ultrasonographic prediction of birthweight. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 2019, 2019

Photogrammetry of fetal breathing movements during the third trimester of pregnancy: observations in normal and abnormal pregnancies. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 32(4): 515-519, 2008

Ultrasound fetal thigh-calf circumferences and gestational age--independent fetal ratios in normal pregnancy. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 4(6): 287-292, 1985

Maternal serum hCG and fetal nuchal translucency thickness for the prediction of fetal trisomies in the first trimester of pregnancy. British Journal Of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 102(2): 127-132, 1995

Fetal and fetal brain volume estimation in the third trimester of human pregnancy using gradient echo MR imaging. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 16(3): 235-240, 1998

Pregnancy complications with abnormal results of biochemical screening for Down syndrome in second trimester and normal fetal karyotype. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiia 41(6): 3-12, 2003

Prediction of fetal growth restriction using estimated fetal weight vs a combined screening model in the third trimester. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 50(5): 603-611, 2016

Value of determining correlations between various fetal measurements in the third trimester of pregnancy in the diagnosis of fetal growth retardation. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiia 1986(6): 28-31, 1986

First trimester fetal head and trunk volume predict growth disturbance in twin pregnancy. Prenatal Diagnosis 31(6): 543-547, 2011

Oligohydramnios in the second trimester of pregnancy, fetal breathing and normal lung growth. Early Human Development 17(1): 37-40, 1988

Fetal and maternal diurnal rhythms during the third trimester of normal pregnancy: Outcomes of computerized analysis of continuous twenty-four-hour fetal heart rate recordings. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 178(2): 247-254, 1998

Fetal blood studies. VII. The oxygen pressure gradient between the maternal and fetal bloods of the human in normal and abnormal pregnancy. Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital 101(1): 48-56, 1957