+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Functional and Radiographic Outcomes After Arthroscopic Transosseous Suture Repair of Medium Sized Rotator Cuff Tears



Functional and Radiographic Outcomes After Arthroscopic Transosseous Suture Repair of Medium Sized Rotator Cuff Tears



Arthroscopy 34(1): 50-57



To evaluate the functional and anatomical outcomes after arthroscopic transosseous suture (TOS) repair of 2 to 4 cm sized rotator cuff tears and to identify preoperative factors influencing repair failure. From May 2013 to August 2014, patients with symptomatic 2 to 4 cm full-thickness tears underwent arthroscopic TOS repair, and those who could be followed up for a minimum of 2 years were included in this retrospective study. Functional and anatomical outcomes were analyzed up to 2 years postoperatively. Factors affecting cuff repair failure were evaluated, using both univariate and multivariate analyses. Twenty-seven patients were included. On preoperative magnetic resonance imaging data, the mean anteroposterior dimension tear size was 27.0 ± 3.3 mm and mean retraction was 30.7 ± 3.1 mm. Anatomic failure (Sugaya III, IV, and V) rate was 33% with arthroscopic TOS repair; however, significant improvements were found regardless of cuff healing. Mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (range, 0-100) improved from 48.8 ± 16.6 preoperatively to 80.1 ± 11.1 postoperatively (P < .001), mean Constant score (range, 0-100) improved from 54.5 ± 11.8 to 73.7 ± 8.5 (P < .001), and mean pain visual analog scale score (range, 0-10) improved from 3.9 ± 1.7 to 2.0 ± 1.1 (P < .001). These changes reached each minimal clinically important difference previously reported. Greater tear size in anteroposterior dimension (P = .034), decreased acromiohumeral distance (P = .022), and higher fatty infiltration of supraspinatus (P = .011) were independent preoperative factors associated with repair failure. Twelve patients (44%) experienced intraoperative bone laceration. Arthroscopic TOS repair was a reliable technique for patients with 2 to 4 cm size rotator cuff tear. Preoperative factors associated with cuff repair failure were greater tear size in anteroposterior dimension, decreased acromiohumeral distance, and higher fatty infiltration of supraspinatus. Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 059755853

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 29079262

DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.07.035


Related references

A laboratory comparison of a new arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair to a double row transosseous equivalent rotator cuff repair using suture anchors. Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease 71(2): 128-131, 2013

Clinical and Structural Outcomes after Arthroscopic Repair of Medium- to Massive-Sized Delaminated and Nondelaminated Rotator Cuff Tears. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics 53(3): 384-391, 2019

Clinical and radiographic outcomes after arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears using a suture bridge technique: assessment of repair integrity on magnetic resonance imaging. American Journal of Sports Medicine 40(4): 786-793, 2012

A comparison of outcomes after arthroscopic repair of partial versus small or medium-sized full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 94(12): 1078-1085, 2012

Factors associated with clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a suture bridge technique in medium, large, and massive tears. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 23(11): 1675-1681, 2014

Factors affecting rotator cuff integrity after arthroscopic repair for medium-sized or larger cuff tears: a retrospective cohort study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 27(6): 1012-1020, 2018

Arthroscopic proximal versus open subpectoral biceps tenodesis with arthroscopic repair of small- or medium-sized rotator cuff tears. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy 24(12): 3772-3778, 2016

Arthroscopic Transosseous Suture Repair and Single-Row Anchor Fixation for Rotator Cuff Lesions Did Not Differ for Pain, Function, or Rotator-Cuff Integrity at 15 Months. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 99(22): 1943, 2017

Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in small- to medium-sized tears. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 19(5): 722-725, 2010

Functional status and failed rotator cuff repair predict outcomes after arthroscopic-assisted latissimus dorsi transfer for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 25(4): 658-665, 2016

Prognostic Factors Affecting Rotator Cuff Healing After Arthroscopic Repair in Small to Medium-sized Tears. American Journal of Sports Medicine 43(10): 2386-2392, 2015

Outcomes following arthroscopic transosseous equivalent suture bridge double row rotator cuff repair: a prospective study and short-term results. Sicot-J2:7, 2016

Early structural and functional outcomes for arthroscopic double-row transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair. American Journal of Sports Medicine 39(6): 1217-1225, 2011

Arthroscopic Transosseous and Transosseous-Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair: An Analysis of Cost, Operative Time, and Clinical Outcomes. American Journal of Orthopedics 45(7): E415, 2016

Impact of Platelet-Rich Plasma on Arthroscopic Repair of Small- to Medium-Sized Rotator Cuff Tears: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 4(9): 2325967116665595, 2016