+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Health literacy in type 2 diabetes patients: a systematic review of systematic reviews

Health literacy in type 2 diabetes patients: a systematic review of systematic reviews

Acta Diabetologica 55(1): 1-12

Aim To summarize, critically review, and interpret the evidence related to the systematic reviews on health literacy (HL) amongst type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods The methodology for this study consisted of a systematic review of systematic reviews, using the PRISMA statement and flowchart to select studies, and searching on PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane. The search covered the period between January 2006 and June 2016. Results From the 115 identified record by the queries, only six systematic reviews were included, following a quality evaluation using AMSTAR. The included systematic reviews content was analyzed by the independent work of two authors, using a narrative synthesis approach. The findings of this study (i.e., main themes) are areas of consensus and gaps in knowledge. Areas of consensus are HL definition, HL measurement tools, and the relationship between T2DM patient knowledge (or literacy) and his/her HL. The gaps in knowledge were the assessment of the relations between HL and health outcomes and self-efficacy, the gender differences, the effectiveness of interventions to improve HL, the cost-effectiveness study of interventions to improve HL, and the understanding of the influence of organizational environment on HL. Conclusion This review provides a current state of knowledge to address clinical practice and research proposals. HL could be useful to personalize patients' follow-up and it should be routinely assessed in its three dimensions (i.e. functional, interactive and critical) to enhance patients' ability to cope with clinical recommendations. Future research should be mainly aimed to test the effectiveness of evidence-based interventions to improve HL amongst T2DM patients.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 059788493

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 29129000

DOI: 10.1007/s00592-017-1071-1

Related references

Prevalence of limited health literacy among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review. Plos one 14(5): E0216402, 2019

Health education for patients with acute coronary syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. BMJ Open 7(10): E016857-E016857, 2017

Online patient education interventions in type 2 diabetes or cardiovascular disease: A systematic review of systematic reviews. Primary Care Diabetes 13(1): 16-27, 2019

Systematic review and assessment of systematic reviews examining the effect of periodontal treatment on glycemic control in patients with diabetes. Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal 22(2): E167-E176, 2017

The impact of telehealth remote patient monitoring on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials. Bmc Health Services Research 18(1): 495, 2018

A Critical Review of Search Strategies Used in Recent Systematic Reviews Published in Selected Prosthodontic and Implant-Related Journals: Are Systematic Reviews Actually Systematic?. International Journal of Prosthodontics 30(1): 13-21, 2017

The Effectiveness of Health Literacy Oriented Programs on Physical Activity Behaviour in Middle Aged and Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review. Health Psychology Research 4(1): 5595, 2016

Not all systematic reviews are systematic: a meta-review of the quality of systematic reviews for non-invasive remote monitoring in heart failure. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 19(6): 326-337, 2013

Salutogenically focused outcomes in systematic reviews of intrapartum interventions: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Midwifery 30(4): E151-E156, 2014

Synthesizing and Appraising the Quality of the Evidence on Factors Associated with Medication Adherence in Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews. Value in Health Regional Issues 13: 82-91, 2017

The effectiveness of public health interventions to reduce the health impact of climate change: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Plos one 8(4): E62041, 2013

Systematic Reviews of the Health or Health care of People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review to Identify Gaps in the Evidence Base. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 28(6): 455-523, 2015

Health literacy and health outcomes in diabetes: a systematic review. Journal of General Internal Medicine 28(3): 444-452, 2013

Not All Systematic Reviews are Systematic: A Meta-review of the Quality of Current Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses for Remote Monitoring in Heart Failure. Heart Lung & Circulation 22: S84-S85, 2013

Measuring health literacy in individuals with diabetes: a systematic review and evaluation of available measures. Health Education and Behavior 40(1): 42-55, 2013