+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Judging the gender of the inanimate: Benevolent sexism and gender stereotypes guide impressions of physical objects



Judging the gender of the inanimate: Benevolent sexism and gender stereotypes guide impressions of physical objects



British Journal of Social Psychology 56(3): 537-560



Within a given culture, sexist ideologies and stereotypes are largely characterized by their prescriptive expectations for the types of social and behavioural domains men and women occupy. The activities that take place within these respective domains, however, frequently involve designed, physical artefacts. This study reports a pair of studies that test whether sexist schemas are capable of guiding not only impressions of men and women as social groups, but also their impressions of the inanimate objects associated with these groups. In Study 1, benevolent sexism was found to predict a greater willingness to classify physical objects as being either highly feminine or highly masculine, even when these objects had a neutral rating by the sample as a whole. In Study 2, stereotypes consistent with legitimizing ideologies (i.e., competence and warmth) predicted rating associated objects in complementary ways, in terms of greater liking of feminine objects but greater presumed competence needed for using masculine objects. These results demonstrate how sexist beliefs and attitudes are capable of bleeding into people's impressions of the physical world.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 059900130

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 28466538

DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12198


Related references

Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88(3): 498-509, 2005

Help to perpetuate traditional gender roles: Benevolent sexism increases engagement in dependency-oriented cross-gender helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 110(1): 55-75, 2016

When sexism is persuasive: agreement with hostile and benevolent sexism as a function of source gender. Social Influence 10(4): 264-277, 2015

The burden of benevolent sexism: how it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology 35(5): 633-642, 2005

Internalizing sexism within close relationships: Perceptions of intimate partners' benevolent sexism promote women's endorsement of benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 110(2): 214-238, 2016

An ambivalent alliance. Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist 56(2): 109-118, 2001

The compassionate sexist? How benevolent sexism promotes and undermines gender equality in the workplace. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 111(5): 706-727, 2016

Gender Stereotypes and Discrimination: How Sexism Impacts Development. Advances in Child Development and Behavior 50: 105-133, 2016

Sexism in gynecology textbooks: gender stereotypes and paternalism, 1978 through 1983. Health Care for Women International 9(1): 1-17, 1988

Gender Differences in Child Aggression: Relations With Gender-Differentiated Parenting and Parents' Gender-Role Stereotypes. Child Development 88(1): 299-316, 2016

Gender and Compensation: Understanding the Impact of Gender and Gender Stereotypes in Children's Rewards. Journal of Genetic Psychology 2018: 1-13, 2018

Communal stereotypes prime men's benevolent sexism: Implications for romance and family. Psychology of Men and Masculinity 10(1): 88-94, 2009

The social nature of benevolent sexism and the antisocial nature of hostile sexism: Is benevolent sexism more likely to manifest in public contexts and hostile sexism in private contexts?. International Journal of Psychology 50(5): 363-371, 2016

Forming impressions: effects of facial expression and gender stereotypes. Psychological Reports 114(2): 557-571, 2014

Does learning Spanish grammatical gender change English-speaking adults' categorization of inanimate objects?. Bilingualism 14(02): 203-220, 2011