+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Laryngeal mask airway as a rescue device for failed endotracheal intubation during scene-to-hospital air transport of combat casualties



Laryngeal mask airway as a rescue device for failed endotracheal intubation during scene-to-hospital air transport of combat casualties



European Journal of Emergency Medicine 25(5): 368-371



Advanced airway management of combat casualties during scene-to-hospital air transport is challenging. Because of the short transport time, flight physicians of the Israeli military airborne combat evacuation unit are approved for the use of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in the event of failed endotracheal intubation (ETI). The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of LMA use during scene-to-hospital transport of combat casualties in Israel. A retrospective cohort analysis of all combat casualties treated with ETI during scene-to-hospital transport over a 3-year period was carried out. Successful LMA insertion was defined as satisfactory placement of the device on the basis of adequate chest expansion with bag-mask ventilation. The median flight time from scene to hospital was 13 min [interquartile range (IQR): 9-15 min]. Sixty-five casualties underwent ETI attempts, 47 successful and 18 failed. All 18 casualties who had failed ETI underwent LMA insertion as a rescue treatment. Six casualties suffered from traumatic brain injury, six had firearm injuries, two had blast injuries, and two had inhalational injuries. LMA insertion was successful in 16/18 (88.9%) casualties, 14 survived to hospital discharge, whereas two were declared dead upon hospital arrival. Two cases of LMA insertion were unsuccessful, but patients survived to hospital discharge. Among the 16 successful cases, the median oxygen saturation on scene-pickup before LMA insertion and on hospital-handover with LMA in place were 90% (IQR: 84-96%) and 98% (IQR: 96-99%), respectively (P<0.0001, the 95% confidence interval for difference between medians was 4-11). The findings of this study suggest that in the event of failed ETI, combat casualties can be treated effectively with LMA during a short scene-to-hospital transport time.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 059909175

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 28657971

DOI: 10.1097/mej.0000000000000480


Related references

Laryngeal mask airway as a rescue device for failed endotracheal intubation during scene-to-hospital air transport of combat casualties. European Journal of Emergency Medicine 26(1): 73-74, 2019

Laryngeal mask airway as a rescue device for failed endotracheal intubation. European Journal of Emergency Medicine 26(1): 73, 2019

Laryngeal mask airway and bougie intubation failures: the Combitube as a secondary rescue device for in-hospital emergency airway management. Anesthesia and Analgesia 103(5): 1264-1266, 2006

Combat trauma airway management: endotracheal intubation versus laryngeal mask airway versus combitube use by Navy SEAL and Reconnaissance combat corpsmen. Journal of Trauma 46(5): 927-932, 1999

Airway equipment and its maintenance for a non difficult adult airway management (endotracheal intubation and its alternative: face mask, laryngeal mask airway, laryngeal tube). Annales Francaises d'Anesthesie et de Reanimation 22(Suppl. 1): 28s-40s, 2003

Peculiar laryngeal mask airway packaging results in failed ventilation when used as a rescue airway device during an anaesthetic crisis. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 44(6): 788-789, 2016

Failed intubating laryngeal mask airway-guided blind endotracheal intubation in a severe postburn contractured neck patient. Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica 62(2): 95-99, 2011

Tracheal intubation with Pentax AWS Airway Scope after failed fiberoptic intubation and failed insertion of the intubating laryngeal mask airway. Masui. Japanese Journal of Anesthesiology 59(4): 470-472, 2010

Evaluation of the intubating laryngeal mask as a primary airway device and a guide for blind endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 87(3 Suppl. ): A485, 1997

Can the laryngeal mask airway replace endotracheal intubation for airway control? The argument for the laryngeal mask airway. Israel Medical Association Journal 6(4): 240, 2004

Meta-analysis of the effects between endotracheal intubation and laryngeal mask airway for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue 30(2): 128-133, 2018

Out-of-hospital rescue oxygenation and tracheal intubation with the intubating laryngeal mask airway in a morbidly obese patient. Annals of Emergency Medicine 43(1): 140-141, 2004

Clinical evaluation of the v-gel supraglottic airway device in comparison with a classical laryngeal mask and endotracheal intubation in cats during spontaneous and controlled mechanical ventilation. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 43(1): 55-62, 2016

Laryngeal mask airway versus bag-mask ventilation or endotracheal intubation for neonatal resuscitation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005(2): Cd003314, 2005

Laryngeal mask airway versus bag-mask ventilation or endotracheal intubation for neonatal resuscitation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 3: Cd003314, 2018