+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Pain Measurement in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: Behavioral Pain Tools Versus Analgesia Nociception Index

Pain Measurement in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: Behavioral Pain Tools Versus Analgesia Nociception Index

Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine 21(9): 585-588

Pain is highly prevalent in critically ill trauma patients, especially those with a traumatic brain injury (TBI). Behavioral pain tools such as the behavioral pain scale (BPS) and critical-care pain observation tool are recommended for sedated noncommunicative patients. Analysis of heart rate variability (HRV) is a noninvasive method to evaluate autonomic nervous system activity. The analgesia nociception index (ANI) device (Physiodoloris®, MDoloris Medical Systems, Loos, France) allows noninvasive HRV analysis. The ANI assesses the relative parasympathetic tone as a surrogate for antinociception/nociception balance in sedated patients. The primary aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of ANI in detecting pain in TBI patients. The secondary aim was to evaluate the impact of norepinephrine use on ANI effectiveness and to determine the correlation between ANI and BPS. We performed a prospective observational study in 21 deeply sedated TBI patients. Exclusion criteria were nonsinus cardiac rhythm; presence of pacemaker; atropine or isoprenaline treatment; neuromuscular blocking agents; and major cognitive impairment. Heart rate, blood pressure, and ANI were continuously recorded using the Physiodoloris® device at rest (T1), during (T2), and after the end (T3) of the painful stimulus (tracheal suctioning). In total, 100 observations were scored. ANI was significantly lower at T2 (Median [min - max] 54.5 [22-100]) compared with T1 (90.5 [50-100], P < 0.0001) and T3 (82 [36-100], P < 0.0001). Similar results were found in the subgroups of patients with (65 measurements) or without (35) norepinephrine. During procedure, a negative linear relationship was observed between ANI and BPS (r2 = -0.469, P < 0.001). At the threshold of 50, the sensitivity and specificity of ANI to detect patients with BPS ≥ 5 were 73% and 62%, respectively, with a negative predictive value of 86%. Our results suggest that ANI is effective in detecting pain in ventilated sedated TBI patients, including those patients treated with norepinephrine.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 060062698

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 28970658

Related references

Pain measurement in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: Behavioral Pain Scale versus Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool. Journal of Critical Care 30(1): 167-172, 2015

Pain Measurement in Mechanically Ventilated Patients After Cardiac Surgery: Comparison of the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) and the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT). Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 31(4): 1227-1234, 2017

An evaluation of instruments for scoring physiological and behavioral cues of pain, non-pain related distress, and adequacy of analgesia and sedation in pediatric mechanically ventilated patients: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies 51(4): 654-676, 2014

Psychometric validation of the behavioral indicators of pain scale for the assessment of pain in mechanically ventilated and unable to self-report critical care patients. Medicina Intensiva 40(8): 463-473, 2016

Pain assessment of traumatic brain injury victims using the Brazilian version of the Behavioral Pain Scale. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva 30(1): 42-49, 2018

Validation of a behavioral pain scale in critically ill, sedated, and mechanically ventilated patients. Anesthesia and Analgesia 101(5): 1470-1476, 2005

Pain Measurement in Mechanically Ventilated Patients After Cardiac Surgery. Survey of Anesthesiology 61(5-6): 122, 2017

Pain measurement techniques: spotlight on mechanically ventilated patients. Journal of Pain Research 11: 2969-2980, 2018

Intraobserver reliability and internal consistency of the Behavioral Pain Scale in mechanically-ventilated patients. Enfermeria Intensiva 26(1): 24-31, 2016

Validation of the Brazilian version of Behavioral Pain Scale in adult sedated and mechanically ventilated patients. Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia 67(3): 271-277, 2017

Analgesia nociception index for the assessment of pain in critically ill patients: a diagnostic accuracy study. British Journal of Anaesthesia 119(4): 812-820, 2017

Exploring the validity of the bispectral index, the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool and vital signs for the detection of pain in sedated and mechanically ventilated critically ill adults: a pilot study. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing 27(1): 46-52, 2011

A first contribution to the validation of the Italian version of the Behavioral Pain Scale in sedated, intubated, and mechanically ventilated paediatric patients. Acta Bio-Medica 89(7-S): 19-24, 2018

Psychometric Analysis of Behavioral Pain Scale Brazilian Version in Sedated and Mechanically Ventilated Adult Patients: A Preliminary Study. Pain Practice 16(4): 451-458, 2016

Behavioral and physiologic indicators of pain in nonverbal patients with a traumatic brain injury: an integrative review. Pain Management Nursing 15(2): 506-518, 2014