+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Prevention of alveolar osteitis after third molar surgery: Comparative study of the effect of warm saline and chlorhexidine mouth rinses



Prevention of alveolar osteitis after third molar surgery: Comparative study of the effect of warm saline and chlorhexidine mouth rinses



Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice 20(4): 470-473



Chlorhexidine mouth rinses have a proven efficacy for the prevention of alveolar osteitis after third molar surgery. This study compares the efficacy of warm saline rinse, a component of postextraction instructions, with that of chlorhexidine in our institution over a period of 2 years. Apparently healthy patients who were referred to the Oral Surgery Clinic of our institution, with an indication for surgical extraction of lower third molar were prospectively, consecutively, and uniformly randomized into warm saline and chlorhexidine groups. The experimental group (n = 50/100) were instructed to gargle twice daily with warm saline, whereas the chlorhexidine group (n = 50/100) were instructed to gargle with 0.12% chlorhexidine. Information on demographic, types and level of impaction, indications for extraction, and development of alveolar osteitis were obtained and analyzed. Comparative statistics were done using Pearson's Chi-square, Fisher's exact, or Mann-Whitney U-tests as appropriate. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The demographic, types and level of impaction as well as indications for extractions were comparable between the study groups (P > 0.05). The overall prevalence of alveolar osteitis was 5%. There was no statistically significant difference between application of warm saline and 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse with respect to the development of alveolar osteitis (P = 0.648). Warm saline mouth rinse is equally as effective as chlorhexidine mouth rinse, as prophylaxis against prevention of alveolar osteitis after third molar surgery.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 060130353

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 28406129

DOI: 10.4103/1119-3077.180064


Related references

Role of warm saline mouth rinse in prevention of alveolar osteitis: a randomized controlled trial. Nigerian Journal of Medicine 24(1): 28-31, 2015

Randomized, double-blind study on effectiveness of intra-alveolar chlorhexidine gel in reducing the incidence of alveolar osteitis in mandibular third molar surgery. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 35(4): 348-351, 2005

Effectiveness of chlorhexidine gel versus chlorhexidine rinse in reducing alveolar osteitis in mandibular third molar surgery. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 66(3): 441-445, 2008

Efficacy of intra-alveolar chlorhexidine gel in reducing frequency of alveolar osteitis in mandibular third molar surgery. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan 22(2): 91-94, 2012

Randomized, double-blind study of effectiveness of intra-alveolar application of chlorhexidine gel in reducing incidence of alveolar osteitis and bleeding complications in mandibular third molar surgery in patients with bleeding disorders. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 68(6): 1322-1326, 2010

Effects of 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate and amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid on the prevention of alveolar osteitis following mandibular third molar extractions. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology & Endodontics 94(3): 301-304, September, 2002

The efficacy of chlorhexidine gel in the prevention of alveolar osteitis after mandibular third molar extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bmc Oral Health 17(1): 82-82, 2017

Effects of a chlorhexidine gluconate oral rinse on the incidence of alveolar osteitis in mandibular third molar surgery. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 48(5): 444-8; Discussion 449, 1990

Intra-alveolar chlorhexidine gel for the prevention of dry socket in mandibular third molar surgery. A pilot study. Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal 11(2): E179-E184, 2006

Effectiveness of 1% versus 0.2% chlorhexidine gels in reducing alveolar osteitis from mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal 18(4): E693-E700, 2014

Effect of different mouth rinses on third molar surgery-related oral malodor. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics 105(3): E1-E8, 2008

Comparative study of 2% and 12% digluconate chlorhexidine mouth rinses on the level of dental staining and gingival indices. 2012

The effect of polylactic acid granules on the incidence of alveolar osteitis after mandibular third molar surgery: A prospective randomized study. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontics 80(3): 279-283, 1995

Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of different concentrations of chlorhexidine mouth rinses in reducing the mutans streptococci in saliva: an in vivo study. Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry 28(3): 162-166, 2011

Retention and plaque inhibiting effect in man of chlorhexidine after multiple mouth rinses and retention and release of chlorhexidine after tooth brushing with a chlorhexidine gel. Archives of Oral Biology 23(4): 295-300, 1978