EurekaMag
+ Most Popular
Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations in China
Mammalian lairs in paleo ecological studies and palynology
Studies on technological possibilities in utilization of anhydrous milk fat for production of recombined butter-like products
Should right-sided fibroelastomas be operated upon?
Large esophageal lipoma
Apoptosis in the mammalian thymus during normal histogenesis and under various in vitro and in vivo experimental conditions
Poissons characoides nouveaux ou non signales de l'Ilha do Bananal, Bresil
Desensitizing efficacy of Colgate Sensitive Maximum Strength and Fresh Mint Sensodyne dentifrices
Administration of fluid by subcutaneous infusion: revival of a forgotten method
Tundra mosquito control - an impossible dream?
Schizophrenia for primary care providers: how to contribute to the care of a vulnerable patient population
Geochemical pattern analysis; method of describing the Southeastern limestone regional aquifer system
Incidence of low birth weights in a hospital of Mexico City
Tabanidae
Graded management intensity of grassland systems for enhancing floristic diversity
Microbiology and biochemistry of cheese and fermented milk
The ember tetra: a new pygmy characid tetra from the Rio das Mortes, Brazil, Hyphessobrycon amandae sp. n. (Pisces, Characoidei)
Risk factors of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients after coronary artery intervention
Renovation of onsite domestic wastewater in a poorly drained soil
Observations of the propagation velocity and formation mechanism of burst fractures caused by gunshot
Systolic blood pressure in a population of infants in the first year of life: the Brompton study
Haematological studies in rats fed with metanil yellow
Studies on pasteurellosis. I. A new species of Pasteurella encountered in chronic fowl cholera
Dormancy breaking and germination of Acacia salicina Lindl. seeds
therapy of lupus nephritis. a two-year prospective study

Randomized Prospective Study to Compare Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Umbilical Single-incision Appendectomy


Randomized Prospective Study to Compare Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Umbilical Single-incision Appendectomy



Annals of Surgery 261(6): E164



ISSN/ISBN: 1528-1140

PMID: 24374528

DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000000452


Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 060168536

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

Related references

Randomized prospective study to compare laparoscopic appendectomy versus umbilical single-incision appendectomy. Annals of Surgery 257(3): 413-418, 2013

Comparison of postoperative pain after needle grasper-assisted single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial (PANASILA trial). Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research 101(6): 350-359, 2021

Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy for adult acute appendicitis: a Meta-analysis for randomized controlled trials. Zhong Nan da Xue Xue Bao. Yi Xue Ban 39(12): 1299-1305, 2014

Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surgery Today 45(9): 1179-1186, 2015

Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study. Annals of Surgery 257(2): 214-218, 2013

Prospective, randomized comparative study between single-port laparoscopic appendectomy and conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. Cirugia Espanola 92(7): 472-477, 2014

A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. American Journal of Surgery 169(2): 208, 1995

A prospective, randomized controlled trial of single-incision laparoscopic vs conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 218(5): 950-959, 2014

Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Experiences From 1208 Cases of Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Experiences From 1208 Cases of Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Annals of Surgery 262(6): 1054-1058, 2015

Comparative study between single-incision and three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part a 23(5): 431-436, 2013

Single incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Annals of Surgery 254(4): 586-590, 2011

Conventional laparoscopic appendectomy versus double-incision, three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: A 1-year randomized controlled trial. Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery 11(4): 366-372, 2018

Is single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy suitable for complicated appendicitis? a comparative analysis with standard multiport laparoscopic appendectomy. Asian Journal of Surgery 43(1): 282-289, 2020

Comparison of transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy versus single incision laparoscopic appendectomy in children: which is the better surgical option?. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 51(8): 1288-1291, 2016

Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy is comparable to conventional laparoscopic and laparotomic appendectomy: our single center single surgeon experience. Il Giornale di Chirurgia 34(7-8): 216-219, 2013