+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Reading from the Black Box: What Sensors Tell Us about Resting and Recovery after Real-World Falls

Reading from the Black Box: What Sensors Tell Us about Resting and Recovery after Real-World Falls

Gerontology 64(1): 90-95

Lying on the floor for a long time after falls, regardless of whether an injury results, remains an unsolved health care problem. In order to develop efficient and acceptable fall detection and reaction approaches, it is relevant to improve the understanding of the circumstances and the characteristics of post-impact responses and the return or failure to return to pre-fall activities. Falls are seldom observed by others; until now, the knowledge about movement kinematics during falls and following impact have been anecdotal. This study aimed to analyse characteristics of the on-ground and recovery phases after real-world falls. The aim was to compare self-recovered falls (defined as returns to standing from the floor) and non-recovered falls with long lies. Data from subjects in different settings and of different populations with high fall risk were included. Real-world falls collected by inertial sensors worn on the lower back were taken from the FARSEEING database if reliable information was available from fall reports and sensor signals. Trunk pitch angle and acceleration were analysed to describe different patterns of recovery movements while standing up from the floor after the impact of a fall. Falls with successful recovery, where an upright posture was regained, were different from non-recovered falls in terms of resting duration (median 10.5 vs. 34.5 s, p = 0.045). A resting duration longer than 24.5 s (area under the curve = 0.796) after the fall impact was a predictor for the inability to recover to standing. Successful recovery to standing showed lower cumulative angular pitch movement than attempted recovery in fallers that did not return to a standing position (median = 76°, interquartile range 24-170° vs. median = 308°, interquartile range 30-1,209°, p = 0.06). Fall signals with and without successful returns to standing showed different patterns during the phase on the ground. Characteristics of real-world falls provided through inertial sensors are relevant to improve the classification and the sensing of falls. The findings are also important for redesigning emergency response processes after falls in order to better support individuals in case of an unrecovered fall. This is crucial for preventing long lies and other fall-related incidents that require an automated fall alarm.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 060173016

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 28848150

DOI: 10.1159/000478092

Related references

Temporal and kinematic variables for real-world falls harvested from lumbar sensors in the elderly population. Conference Proceedings 2015: 5183-5186, 2016

Fall detection algorithms for real-world falls harvested from lumbar sensors in the elderly population: a machine learning approach. Conference Proceedings 2016: 3712-3715, 2017

The FARSEEING real-world fall repository: a large-scale collaborative database to collect and share sensor signals from real-world falls. European Review of Aging and Physical Activity 13: 8, 2016

Bringing the real world to psychometric evaluation of cervical cancer literacy assessments with Black, Latina, and Arab women in real-world settings. Journal of Cancer Education 28(4): 738-743, 2014

Tracking the reading eye: towards a model of real-world reading. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 33(3): 193-201, 2017

Statistical studies of the meteoritic falls of the world; , A statistical study of the meteoritic falls of the world as of date 1941, January 1; Part 2, Their areal concentration; Part 3, Their time distribution; Part 4, The classificational distribution; Part 5, The observed sideritic and siderolitic falls; Part 6, Doubtful and duplicate falls and falls having uncertain and intermediate classifications. Part 7(49): 151-159 1941, 1941

Virtual reality and the prevention of falls in the real world. Lancet 388(10050): 1132-1134, 2016

A balanced approach to falls prevention: Application in the real world. Health Promotion Journal of Australia 29(2): 199-203, 2018

Real World Map Reading Strategies. Cartographic Journal 40(3): 265-268, 2003

Comparison of acceleration signals of simulated and real-world backward falls. Medical Engineering and Physics 33(3): 368-373, 2011

Evaluation of accelerometer-based fall detection algorithms on real-world falls. Plos One 7(5): E37062, 2013

Reconstruction of real world head injury accidents resulting from falls using multibody dynamics. Clinical Biomechanics 18(7): 590-600, 2003

Real-world quantum sensors: evaluating resources for precision measurement. Physical Review Letters 107(11): 113603, 2011

Portable laser based mid-IR gas sensors Development and real-world applications. Abstracts of Papers American Chemical Society 222(1-2): ANYL203, 2001

Preventing Reading Difficulties: Rhyme and Alliteration in the Real World. Educational Psychology in Practice 9(4): 235-240, 1994