+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Short and long-term prognostic value of hyponatremia in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction versus reduced ejection fraction: An analysis of the Korean Acute Heart Failure registry



Short and long-term prognostic value of hyponatremia in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction versus reduced ejection fraction: An analysis of the Korean Acute Heart Failure registry



International Journal of Cardiology 248: 239-245



Hyponatremia is a well-known risk factor for worse outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients. The impact of hyponatremia according to the ejection fraction (EF) is unclear. We evaluated the prognostic value of hyponatremia according to HF type. The Korea Acute Heart Failure (KorAHF) registry consecutively enrolled 5625 patients. Hyponatremia was defined as serum sodium level<135mmol/L at hospital admission. HF with preserved and reduced ejection fraction were defined as an LVEF ≥50% and LVEF ≤40%, respectively. Among 5103 patients with available EF, 2088 (60%) had HFrEF, and 1284 (25%) had HFpEF. There was no difference in serum sodium level between the groups (HFrEF: 137.4±4.7mmol/L vs. HFpEF: 137.5±5.0mmol/L, P=0.710). Hyponatremic patients had higher in-hospital mortality or urgent heart transplantation in all (11.3% vs. 4.5%, P<0.001), in HFrEF (13.1% vs. 4.9%, P<0.001), and in HFpEF (6.0% vs. 1.9%, P<0.001). After adjustment for significant covariates, hyponatremia was associated with 1.5 fold increased risk for 1-year post-discharge death in the HFrEF group (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.24-1.86), but not in the HFpEF group (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.84-1.61). During admission, the sodium status changed in 22% of the patients and the discharge sodium status had greater prognostic value. Hyponatremia is independent of HF type. Hyponatremia is a significant risk factor for adverse in-hospital outcomes; however its long-term prognostic value is only limited to patients with HFrEF, but not for those with HFpEF.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 060245896

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 28821416

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.08.004


Related references

Relation of Renal Function with Left Ventricular Systolic Function and NT-proBNP Level and Its Prognostic Implication in Heart Failure with Preserved versus Reduced Ejection Fraction: an analysis from the Korean Heart Failure (KorHF) Registry. Korean Circulation Journal 47(5): 727-741, 2017

The Association of Hemoglobin A1c with Short-term Outcomes in Patients who Have Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and Diabetes: Results from Korean Acute Heart Failure Registry. Journal of Cardiac Failure 21(8): S54-S55, 2015

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction has a better long-term prognosis than heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in old patients in a 5-year follow-up retrospective study. International Journal of Cardiology 232: 86-92, 2017

Epidemiology and one-year outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved, mid-range and reduced ejection fraction: an analysis of the ESC Heart Failure Long-Term Registry. European Journal of Heart Failure, 2017

Characteristics and long-term prognosis of patients with heart failure and mid-range ejection fraction compared with reduced and preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Esc Heart Failure 5(4): 685-694, 2018

Effects of exercise on left ventricular systolic and diastolic properties in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction versus heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction. Circulation. Heart Failure 6(3): 508-516, 2013

Tolvaptan Improves the Long-Term Prognosis in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction as Well as in Those With Reduced Ejection Fraction. International Heart Journal 57(5): 600-606, 2016

Effective blood hemoglobin level to predict prognosis in heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: results of the Japanese heart failure syndrome with preserved ejection fraction registry. Heart and Vessels 34(7): 1168-1177, 2019

New drugs and devices in the pipeline for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction versus heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Current Heart Failure Reports 11(4): 374-381, 2014

Comparison of β-blocker effectiveness in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction versus those with reduced ejection fraction. Journal of Cardiac Failure 19(2): 73-79, 2013

Circulating levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha receptor 2 are increased in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction relative to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: evidence for a divergence in pathophysiology. Plos one 9(6): E99495, 2014

Arterial Stiffness and Risk of Overall Heart Failure, Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, and Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: The Health ABC Study (Health, Aging, and Body Composition). Hypertension 69(2): 267-274, 2017

Comparison of characteristics and outcomes of patients with heart failure preserved ejection fraction versus reduced left ventricular ejection fraction in an urban cohort. American Journal of Cardiology 113(4): 691-696, 2014

Comparison of the reliability of E/E' to estimate pulmonary capillary wedge pressure in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction versus those with reduced ejection fraction. International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 31(8): 1497-1502, 2015

Heart failure with normal ejection fraction, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, diastolic heart failure, or huff-puff: time for a new taxonomy for hypertensive-metabolic heart failure. Journal of Cardiac Failure 20(10): 779-781, 2014