+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Single vs 2 Implants on Peri-implant Marginal Bone Level and Implant Failures in Mandibular Implant Overdentures: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis



Single vs 2 Implants on Peri-implant Marginal Bone Level and Implant Failures in Mandibular Implant Overdentures: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis



Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice 17(3): 216-225



As a consensus, the 2-implant supported overdentures (ODs) are considered as the first choice of treatment for the edentulous mandible. In the same context, there is increased evidence supporting the use of single-implant OD. The aim of any design is to preserve the remaining structures and allow the longevity of the treatment. To evaluate the impact of single implant vs 2 implants on the peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL) and number of implant failures in mandibular implant overdentures. A literature search of electronic databases (PubMed and Cochrane) was performed up to March 2016 and complemented by hand search. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that evaluated MBL and number of implant failures relative to single-implant mandibular overdenture (MOD) were selected. The review and meta-analysis were performed using meta-analytic statistical package and in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Five RCTs met the inclusion criteria for systematic review and qualitative synthesis. The observation period ranged from 12 months to 5 years in the selected RCTs. The comparison included in the meta-analysis is single- vs 2-implant MODs. Pooled data revealed that single-implant MODs significantly decreased the MBL (mean difference: 0.27, 95% confidence interval: 0.20-0.34, P < .0001, I2 = 0%) and number of implant failures (risk ratio: 3.26, 95% confidence interval: 1.18-8.97), P = .02; I2 = 0%). Single-implant MOD was found to be better than 2-implant MOD in terms of MBL and number of implant failures. However, this result should be interpreted with caution due to limited number of analyzed studies with different loading protocols and short follow-up period.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 060254255

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 28865818

DOI: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2017.02.002


Related references

Effect of implant loading protocols on failure and marginal bone loss with unsplinted two-implant-supported mandibular overdentures: systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 47(5): 642-650, 2018

Influence of Implant Positions and Occlusal Forces on Peri-Implant Bone Stress in Mandibular Two-Implant Overdentures: A 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Journal of Oral Implantology 43(6): 419-428, 2017

Effect of implant position, angulation, and attachment height on peri-implant bone stress associated with mandibular two-implant overdentures: a finite element analysis. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 27(5): E69-E76, 2013

Peri-implant marginal bone level: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing platform switching versus conventionally restored implants. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 39(11): 1097-1113, 2012

Implant survival in 1- versus 2-implant mandibular overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research 27(1): 63-72, 2016

Association Between Peri-implant Bone Morphology and Marginal Bone Loss: A Retrospective Study on Implant-Supported Mandibular Overdentures. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 32(1): 147-155, 2016

Effect of Implant Height Differences on Different Attachment Types and Peri-Implant Bone in Mandibular Two-Implant Overdentures: 3D Finite Element Study. Journal of Oral Implantology 41(3): E50-E59, 2015

Impact of platform switching on marginal peri-implant bone-level changes. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research 26(3): 342-358, 2015

Comparing short dental implant and standard dental implant in terms of marginal bone level changes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 21(4): 796-812, 2019

Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system. International Journal of Implant Dentistry 3(1): 41, 2017

The influence of implant-abutment connection to peri-implant bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 20(4): 653-664, 2018

Clinical viability of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 47(9): 1166-1177, 2018

Prosthodontic maintenance and peri-implant tissue conditions for telescopic attachment-retained mandibular implant overdenture: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. European Journal of Dentistry 11(4): 559-568, 2017

Influence of subcrestal implant placement compared with equicrestal position on the peri-implant hard and soft tissues around platform-switched implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Investigations 22(2): 555-570, 2018

Effect of Submerged vs Nonsubmerged Implant Placement Protocols on Implant Failure and Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Prosthodontics 31(1): 15-22, 2018