+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Succession of biofilm communities responsible for biofouling of membrane bio-reactors (MBRs)

Succession of biofilm communities responsible for biofouling of membrane bio-reactors (MBRs)

Plos one 12(7): E0179855

Biofilm formation is one of the main factors associated with membrane biofouling in membrane bioreactors (MBRs). As such, it is important to identify the responsible organisms to develop targeted strategies to control biofouling. This study investigated the composition and changes in the microbial communities fouling MBR membranes over time and correlated those changes with an increase in transmembrane pressure (TMP). Based on qPCR data, bacteria were the dominant taxa of the biofilm (92.9-98.4%) relative to fungi (1.5-6.9%) and archaea (0.03-0.07%). NMDS analysis indicated that during the initial stages of operation, the biofilm communities were indistinguishable from those found in the sludge. However, the biofilm community significantly diverged from the sludge over time and ultimately showed a unique biofilm profile. This suggested that there was strong selection for a group of organisms that were biofilm specialists. This pattern of succession and selection was correlated with the rapid increase in TMP, where bacteria including Rhodospirillales, Sphingomonadales and Rhizobiales dominated the biofilm at this time. While most of the identified fungal OTUs matched Candida sp., the majority of fungal communities were unclassified by 18S rRNA gene sequencing. Collectively, the data suggests that bacteria, primarily, along with fungi may play an important role in the rapid TMP increase and loss of system performance.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 060292484

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 28686622

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179855

Related references

Membrane biofouling in pilot-scale membrane bioreactors (MBRs) treating municipal wastewater: impact of biofilm formation. Environmental Science and Technology 41(2): 632-638, 2007

Succession and convergence of biofilm communities in fixed-film reactors treating aromatic hydrocarbons in groundwater. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 63(1): 270-276, 1997

Process-Oriented Review of Bacterial Quorum Quenching for Membrane Biofouling Mitigation in Membrane Bioreactors (MBRs). Membranes 6(4):, 2016

Managing microbial communities in membrane biofilm reactors. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 102(21): 9003-9014, 2018

Biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes: effects of cleaning on biofilm microbial communities, membrane performance, and adherence of extracellular polymeric substances. Biofouling 33(5): 397-409, 2017

Pyrosequencing analysis yields comprehensive assessment of microbial communities in pilot-scale two-stage membrane biofilm reactors. Environmental Science and Technology 48(13): 7511-7518, 2014

Analysis of Microbial Communities in Biofilms from CSTR-Type Hollow Fiber Membrane Biofilm Reactors for Autotrophic Nitrification and Hydrogenotrophic Denitrification. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 25(10): 1670-1679, 2015

Pyrosequencing analysis of microbial communities in hollow fiber-membrane biofilm reactors system for treating high-strength nitrogen wastewater. Chemosphere 163: 192-201, 2016

Characterisation of biofilm constituents and their effect on membrane filterability in MBRs. Water Science and Technology 58(10): 1933-1939, 2008

The differential influence of isolated biofilm-forming bacteria on the ecological succession and biodiversity of biofouling in an estuarine environment. Abstracts of the General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology 97: 507-508, 1997

Membrane Distillation Biofouling: Impact of Feedwater Temperature on Biofilm Characteristics and Membrane Performance. Environmental Science and Technology 52(17): 10019-10029, 2018

Nitritation performance in membrane-aerated biofilm reactors differs from conventional biofilm systems. Water Research 44(20): 6073-6084, 2010

A biofilm model to understand the onset of sulfate reduction in denitrifying membrane biofilm reactors. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 110(3): 763-772, 2013

Nitrate removal and biofilm characteristics in methanotrophic membrane biofilm reactors with various gas supply regimes. Water Research 44(1): 85-96, 2010

Membrane biofouling process correlated to the microbial community succession in an A/O MBR. Bioresource Technology 197: 185-192, 2015