+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The quality of mental health literacy measurement tools evaluating the stigma of mental illness: a systematic review

The quality of mental health literacy measurement tools evaluating the stigma of mental illness: a systematic review

Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 27(5): 433-462

Stigma of mental illness is a significant barrier to receiving mental health care. However, measurement tools evaluating stigma of mental illness have not been systematically assessed for their quality. We conducted a systematic review to critically appraise the methodological quality of studies assessing psychometrics of stigma measurement tools and determined the level of evidence of overall quality of psychometric properties of included tools. We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library and ERIC databases for eligible studies. We conducted risk-of-bias analysis with the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments checklist, rating studies as excellent, good, fair or poor. We further rated the level of evidence of the overall quality of psychometric properties, combining the study quality and quality of each psychometric property, as: strong, moderate, limited, conflicting or unknown. We identified 117 studies evaluating psychometric properties of 101 tools. The quality of specific studies varied, with ratings of: excellent (n = 5); good (mostly on internal consistency (n = 67)); fair (mostly on structural validity, n = 89 and construct validity, n = 85); and poor (mostly on internal consistency, n = 36). The overall quality of psychometric properties also varied from: strong (mostly content validity, n = 3), moderate (mostly internal consistency, n = 55), limited (mostly structural validity, n = 55 and construct validity, n = 46), conflicting (mostly test-retest reliability, n = 9) and unknown (mostly internal consistency, n = 36). We identified 12 tools demonstrating limited evidence or above for (+, ++, +++) all their properties, 69 tools reaching these levels of evidence for some of their properties, and 20 tools that did not meet the minimum level of evidence for all of their properties. We note that further research on stigma tool development is needed to ensure appropriate application.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 060377524

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 28462747

DOI: 10.1017/s2045796017000178

Related references

Do biogenetic causal beliefs reduce mental illness stigma in people with mental illness and in mental health professionals? A systematic review. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing 27(3): 928-941, 2018

Measurement properties of mental health literacy tools measuring help-seeking: a systematic review. Journal of Mental Health 26(6): 543-555, 2017

Challenging mental health related stigma in China: Systematic review and meta-analysis. II. Interventions among people with mental illness. Psychiatry Research 255: 457-464, 2017

The Role Of Stigma Coping And Social Support In Mediating The Effect Of Societal Stigma On Internalized Stigma, Mental Health Recovery, And Quality Of Life Among People With Serious Mental Illness. Journal of Community Psychology 41(5): 582-600, 2013

Improving Mental Health Literacy and Mental Illness Stigma in the Population of Hamburg. Psychiatrische Praxis 42(Suppl. 1): S9, 2015

Mental health literacy, stigma and perception of causation of mental illness among Chinese people in Taiwan. International Journal of Social Psychiatry 63(6): 498-507, 2017

Exploring the relationship between social class, mental illness stigma and mental health literacy using British national survey data. Health 19(4): 413-429, 2015

Feasibility, acceptability, and initial efficacy of a knowledge-contact program to reduce mental illness stigma and improve mental health literacy in adolescents. Social Science and Medicine 72(12): 2011-2019, 2011

Measurement tools for mental health problems and mental well-being in people with severe or profound intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review 57: 32-44, 2017

Evaluating Explicit and Implicit Stigma of Mental Illness in Mental Health Professionals and Medical Students. Community Mental Health Journal 51(5): 628-634, 2016

Do Web-based Mental Health Literacy Interventions Improve the Mental Health Literacy of Adult Consumers? Results From a Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 18(6): E165, 2016

Stigma of mental illness, religious change, and explanatory models of mental illness among Jewish patients at a mental-health clinic in North Jerusalem. Mental Health Religion and Culture 11(2): 193-209, 2008

The effectiveness of mental health-related theoretical education and clinical placement in mental health settings in changing the attitudes of health care students towards mental illness: A systematic review. Jbi Library of Systematic Reviews 10(58): 4019-4076, 2012

Conceptualizing and Measuring Mental Illness Stigma: The Mental Illness Stigma Framework and Critical Review of Measures. Stigma and Health 3(4): 348-376, 2018

Evaluating health literacy in people with mental illness using the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults. Nursing Outlook 60(5): 316-321, 2012