+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Total environmental impacts of biofuels from corn stover using a hybrid life cycle assessment model combining process life cycle assessment and economic input-output life cycle assessment



Total environmental impacts of biofuels from corn stover using a hybrid life cycle assessment model combining process life cycle assessment and economic input-output life cycle assessment



Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 14(1): 139-149



Studies on the environmental analysis of biofuels by fast pyrolysis and hydroprocessing (BFPH) have so far focused only on the environmental impacts from direct emissions and have included few indirect emissions. The influence of ignoring some indirect emissions on the environmental performance of BFPH has not been well investigated and hence is not really understood. In addition, in order to avoid shifting environmental problems from one medium to another, a comprehensive assessment of environmental impacts caused by the processes must quantify the environmental emissions to all media (air, water, and land) in relation to each life cycle stage. A well-to-wheels assessment of the total environmental impacts resulting from direct emissions and indirect emissions of a BFPH system with corn stover is conducted using a hybrid life cycle assessment (LCA) model combining the economic input-output LCA and the process LCA. The Tool for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemical and other environmental Impacts (TRACI) has been used to estimate the environmental impacts in terms of acidification, eutrophication, global climate change, ozone depletion, human health criteria, photochemical smog formation, ecotoxicity, human health cancer, and human health noncancer caused by 1 MJ biofuel production. Taking account of all the indirect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, the net GHG emissions (81.8 g CO2 eq/MJ) of the biofuels are still less than those of petroleum-based fuels (94 g CO2 eq/MJ). Maize production and pyrolysis and hydroprocessing make major contributions to all impact categories except the human health criteria. All impact categories resulting from indirect emissions except eutrophication and smog air make more than 24% contribution to the total environmental impacts. Therefore, the indirect emissions are important and cannot be ignored. Sensitivity analysis has shown that corn stover yield and bio-oil yield affect the total environmental impacts of the biofuels more significantly than the biomass transportation distance and biofuel transportation distance. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2018;14:139-149. © 2017 SETAC.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 060409367

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 28796442

DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1969


Related references

Quantifying the total environmental impacts of an industrial symbiosis - a comparison of process-, hybrid and input-output life cycle assessment. Environmental Science and Technology 44(11): 4309-4314, 2010

Assessment of Environmental and Economic Impacts of Vine-Growing Combining Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Costing and Multicriterial Analysis. Sustainability 8(8): 793, 2016

Economic input-output models for environmental life-cycle assessment. Environmental Science & Technology 32(7): 184A-191A, 1998

Extending the Boundaries of Life-Cycle Assessment through Environmental Economic Input-Output Models. Journal of Industrial Ecology 4(3): 7-10, 2000

A regional version of a US economic input-output life-cycle assessment model. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 12(6): 365-372, 2007

Environmental impacts of conventional and sustainable investment funds compared using input-output life-cycle assessment. Journal of Industrial Ecology 11(3): 41-60, 2007

Empirical comparison of process and economic input-output life cycle assessment in service industries. Environmental Science & Technology 40(22): 7070-7076, 2006

Integrating economic input-output life cycle assessment with risk assessment for a screening-level analysis. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13(5): 412-420, 2008

Life cycle assessment of a packaged tomato puree: a comparison of environmental impacts produced by different life cycle phases. Journal of Cleaner Production 73: 275-284, 2014

Evaluating Human and Ecological Impacts of a Product Life Cycle: The Complementary Roles of Life-Cycle Assessment and Risk Assessment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment An International Journal 12(3): 510-527, 2006

A review on Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Energy Assessment and Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Assessment on buildings. Applied Energy 143: 395-413, 2015

Economic assessment of municipal waste management systemscase studies using a combination of life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC). Journal of Cleaner Production 13(3): 253-263, 2005

A benchmark for life cycle air emissions and life cycle impact assessment of hydrokinetic energy extraction using life cycle assessment. Renewable Energy 36(3): 1040-1046, 2011

Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle cost (LCC) analysis model for a stand-alone hybrid renewable energy system. Renewable Energy 95: 337-355, 2016

Analysis of effects of an objective function on environmental and economic performance of a water network system using life cycle assessment and life cycle costing methods. Chemical Engineering Journal4: 3, 368-378, 2008