+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

TU-G-BRCD-01: Will the High Cost of Proton Therapy Facilities Limit the Availability of Proton Therapy Treatment?

TU-G-BRCD-01: Will the High Cost of Proton Therapy Facilities Limit the Availability of Proton Therapy Treatment?

Medical Physics 39(6part24): 3918

The potential dose distribution advantages associated with proton therapy, and particularly with pencil beam scanning (PBS) techniques, have lead to considerable interest in this modality in recent years. However, the large capital expenditure necessary for such a project requires careful financial consideration and business planning. The complexity of the beam delivery systems impacts the capital expenditure and the PBS only systems presently being advocated can reduce these costs. Also several manufacturers are considering "one-room" facilities as less expensive alternatives to multi-room facilities. This presentation includes a brief introduction to beam delivery options (passive scattering, uniform and modulated scanning) and some of the new technologies proposed for providing less expensive proton therapy systems. Based on current experience, data on proton therapy center start-up costs, running costs and the financial challenges associated with making this highly conformal therapy more widely available will be discussed. Issues associated with proton therapy implementation that are key to project success include strong project management, vendor cooperation and collaboration, staff recruitment and training. Time management during facility start up is a major concern, particularly in multi-room systems, where time must be shared between continuing vendor system validation, verification and acceptance testing, and user commissioning and patient treatments. The challenges associated with facility operation during this period and beyond are discussed, focusing on how standardization of process, downtime and smart scheduling can influence operational efficiency. 1. To understand the available choices for proton therapy facilities, the different beam delivery systems and the financial implications associated with these choices. 2. To understand the key elements necessary for successfully implementing a proton therapy program. 3. To understand the challenges associated with on-going facility management to achieve an efficient fully operational system.

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 060429532

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 28518662

Related references

TU-G-BRCD-02: Do Uncertainties in Proton Therapy Limit Its Clinical Potential?. Medical Physics 39(6part24): 3918-3919, 2012

A treatment planning study of proton arc therapy for para-aortic lymph node tumors: dosimetric evaluation of conventional proton therapy, proton arc therapy, and intensity modulated radiotherapy. Radiation Oncology 11(1): 140, 2016

TU-G-BRCD-03: Managing Patient and Organ Motion in Proton Therapy. Medical Physics 39(6part24): 3919, 2012

Dosimetric impact of reduced nozzle-to-isocenter distance in intensity-modulated proton therapy of intracranial tumors in combined proton-carbon fixed-nozzle treatment facilities. Radiation Oncology 8: 218, 2015

Relative biological effectiveness of therapeutic proton beams for HSG cells at Japanese proton therapy facilities. Journal of Radiation Research 55(4): 812-815, 2015

MO-D-BRCD-01: Overview of Clinical Dosimetry and Quality Assurance in Proton Therapy. Medical Physics 39(6part21): 3865, 2012

Proton Therapy in the USA From 2012 to 2014Increasing Treatment of Pediatric, Lung, Head and Neck, Gastrointestinal, and Breast Cancers, But No Increase in Prostate Cancer Treatments: A Study From the National Association for Proton Therapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*biology*physics 96(2): S136-S137, 2016

WE-G-BRCD-03: Improvement in Robustness and Delivery Efficiency of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Using Single-Field Optimization with Energy Absorber. Medical Physics 39(6part28): 3965, 2012

A treatment not all can get. Proton beam therapy spreads amid dilemmas over availability. U.S. News and World Report 144(12): 63-64, 2008

Phase II feasibility study of high-dose radiotherapy for prostate cancer using proton boost therapy: first clinical trial of proton beam therapy for prostate cancer in Japan. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 35(12): 745-752, 2005

The reliability of proton-nuclear interaction cross-section data to predict proton-induced PET images in proton therapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology 56(9): 2687-2698, 2011

Proton Beam Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Comparison of Passively Scattered to Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*biology*physics 90(1): S54-S55, 2014

EP-1404: Early results of proton beam therapy in sarcomas at the West German Proton Therapy Center Essen. RadioTherapy and Oncology 119: S654-S655, 2016

Proton therapy for base of skull chordoma: a report for the Royal College of Radiologists. The Proton Therapy Working Party. Clinical Oncology ) 12(2): 75-79, 2000

SU-E-T-491: A FLUKA Monte Carlo Computational Model of a Scanning Proton Beam Therapy Nozzle at IU Proton Therapy Center. Medical Physics 39(6part17): 3818, 2012