+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Two-Implant-Supported Mandibular Overdentures: Do Clinical Denture Quality and Inter-Implant Distance Affect Patient Satisfaction?



Two-Implant-Supported Mandibular Overdentures: Do Clinical Denture Quality and Inter-Implant Distance Affect Patient Satisfaction?



International Journal of Prosthodontics 30(6): 519–525



To investigate the following three null hypotheses in patients rehabilitated with a mandibular overdenture supported by two unsplinted implants: (1) patient satisfaction is not related to the clinical quality of the dentures; (2) inter-implant distance (IID) has no effect on the clinical quality of the dentures; and (3) IID does not influence patient satisfaction. Forty edentulous patients who were rehabilitated with a two-implant-supported mandibular overdenture participated in the study. Independent investigators evaluated the dentures on the basis of five clinical criteria using the validated Denture Quality Evaluation Form, and the patients completed the validated Denture Satisfaction Scale. Irreversible hydrocolloid impressions of the mandible were made and poured immediately in die stone. The IID was measured by adapting an orthodontic wire to the mandibular alveolar ridge crest, extending from the center of one implant to the center of the other. Spearman correlation analyses were used to identify possible correlations, with a significance level set at P < .05. The clinicians' overall mean rating of the clinical quality of the dentures was 91.5% (standard deviation 6.27%). The stability of the mandibular overdenture and of the maxillary conventional complete denture was significantly related to satisfaction (r = 0.389 and r = 0.44, respectively). Significant associations were found between the mandibular stability items and satisfaction with both maxillary and mandibular dentures. The stability of the maxillary denture was significantly associated with patient satisfaction with mandibular denture retention, stability, and comfort. None of the 12 denture satisfaction items were significantly associated with IID. Similarly, IID did not have an effect on the quality of either denture in terms of retention, stability, or occlusion. Denture stability was the feature that had the most influence on patient satisfaction with the mandibular overdenture and with the maxillary conventional denture. IID had no effect on the clinical quality of either denture and did not influence patient satisfaction.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 060432688

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 29084295

DOI: 10.11607/ijp.5295


Related references

The effect of inter-implant distance on retention and resistance to dislodging forces for mandibular implant-tissue-supported overdentures. Journal of Dentistry 11(5): 506-515, 2014

Clinical evaluation of inter-implant distance influence on the wear characteristics of low-profile stud attachments used in mandibular implant‑retained overdentures. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry 11(1): E33, 2019

Patient satisfaction with maxillary 3-implant overdentures using different attachment systems opposing mandibular 2-implant overdentures. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 14(Suppl. 1): E11, 2012

Patient preference and satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or locator attachments: a crossover clinical trial. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 27(6): 1560-1568, 2012

Implant overdentures: bar versus ball attachment for mandibular implant supported overdentures--a randomised clinical trial. Sadj 59(1): 28-29, 2004

Comparison of patient's satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures and complete dentures. Biomedical Journal 37(3): 156-162, 2014

Randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-supported overdentures and conventional dentures in diabetic patients. Part III: comparisons of patient satisfaction. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 82(4): 416-427, 1999

Comparison of patient satisfaction, quality of life, and bite force between elderly edentulous patients wearing mandibular two implant-supported overdentures and conventional complete dentures after 4 years. Special Care in Dentistry 32(4): 136-141, 2012

Denture satisfaction in a comparative study of implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 11(2): 194-200, 1996

Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study. International Journal of Prosthodontics 15(6): 575-581, 2002

Patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures. A comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI-dental implants. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 26(4): 263-267, 1997

Implant overdentures: dental students' performance in fabrication, denture quality, and patient satisfaction. Journal of Dental Education 74(9): 993-1001, 2010

The use of mandibular implant-retained overdentures improve patient satisfaction and quality of life. Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice 10(1): 61-63, 2010

The use of mandibular implant-retained overdentures improve patient satisfaction and quality of life. Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice 12(3 Suppl): 182-184, 2012

Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 26(2): 415-426, 2011